Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ClareC Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Real fare dodgers provide a fake name and

> > address;-)

>

> xxxxxx

>

> Which the person who catches them can easily check


Shame TFL didn't check the address given by the toerag that gave my address!!

> on the spot and find is false.

>

> Happened to a friend of mine at Clapham Junction.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello,


Just wanted to give you an update. The letter arrived from Southern Prosecutions today. I've copied it below. Can anyone tell me if this is the more serious offence of intent not to pay or the lesser offence? Thank you all for your help and I'll incorporate many of the points above in my explanation along with a copy of my bank statements showing regular payment of travel fares and the Travel Card for the 29th. Any other ideas would be great. Wish me luck and thank you again!


'Notice of intention to prosecute.


On Monday 29th March at 08:14 your details were taken by a Revenue Protection Officer for the offence of not having a valid ticket at LONDON BRIDGE Station.


This letter is to inform you of our intention to take this case to the Magistrates Court and the enclosed form provides you with the opportunity to tell us what happened from your point of view. Information should be both factual and honest.


Fare evasion costs the rail industry over ?400 million per year and Southern Railway has a zero tolerance approach to fare evasion on our network. We always ask that the courts impose the maximum penalty for offenders, which can include any of the following:


- A Criminal Record (always)

- Fine of up to ?1000 (always)

- Prison Sentence

- Suspended Sentence

- Community Service

- Seizure of any Computer Equipment (if involved)

- Compensation (always)


You must reply to this letter using the attached document within 7 days of the above date.'


Signed by the Prosecutions Manager.

Hi,


Standard letter that they send to everyone.


I would suggest that you do try to call the prosecutions manager first (if they will speak to you)


Firstly write down some bullet points of each step of the journey, so you dont forget to say anything and also dont get flustered.


The fact that Southern Railway has a zero tolerence policy on Fare Evasion doesn't mean they dont have room to move on the difference between people that will travel most times without any intention of buying a ticket, and someone, who i think is you in this case, who makes a poor error in judgement call.


Explain that looking back you shouldnt have done what you did and let the frustration of running late and large queues for tickets and a broken automated ticked machine led you into thinking you would get a ticket at the other end.


I would try not to talk too much about tailgaiting someone else through the barrier, that was the REALLY stupid part.


You can only plead your case to them and hope for a fine, maybe even offer to pay a stupidly high fine, its got to be better than the alternative!


Good Luck

Hi all,


I just wanted to bring an end to this sorry story... As suggested by the kind people on this Forum (esp. stevebailey and ianr) I called the Head of Prosecutions for Southern first thing on Monday morning. I found myself almost weeping whilst telling him that I might lose my job, that I was extremely sorry, had made a split second decision to go through the barrier etc etc. It was honest. And it worked. The Gent was extremely nice, professional, and understanding. I asked if there was an opportunity to settle out of court and we agreed (given no previous offences) on a figure in principal there and then on the phone then followed up in writing. I have paid the fine; said "sorry" about a million times; and feel very very relieved.


I want thank you all so very much. Your advice was invaluable. In fact I had contacted a specialist lawyer about the case but didn't like him -- the threatening tone ("you could go to jail unless you you get help..." type of thing) and he would have charged ?750 + VAT!! to complete the written response to the letter....


Anyway, I am extremely grateful I didn't take that route and want to once again thank you all. Thank you.


Fergie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...