Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect you are being offered a few fireman's

> hoses by Miss Hope for your work Brum.

>

> Tell me that is not true....



Ha ha - my cross-post was quite timely! In answer to your question, Mick... if only!

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick! I would never have guessed that. I already

> knew about Sean.




Sean has the power to delete posts. If he has a girly hiss fit...


I'm glad ypou would never have guessed Brum.


That's cos I'm a bloke......awight


enuf

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah! To smell inside Hope and Greenwood,

> Or to taste it as Woof would...


Brum


Stop , my will is wilting ( see I nearly said "willy" there ) and if missus W**F catches me flirting with Miss Hope, with her marzipan drawers....


Well I'm for the high jump ( believe me the bar is set very high this time )


I love your poem, it made my teeth ache with joy



Tell, do you think she sleeps on a giant pink marshmallow ? her bedside lamp, a huge fizzy flying saucer & when she gets up she has a pair of slippers made from those "sweet shrimps" hollowed out for her dainty feet


Do you, I know I do.....Oh Miss Ho.....



*slap slaps own face*



OH STOP ME NOW FCOL






W**F



"Over the counter laid beautifully bare"


( oh dear & blimey, I've just spilled "brasso" everywhere )

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woofmarkthedog Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> ( oh dear & blimey, I've just spilled "brasso"

> everywhere )

>

> Woof is that a Derek and Clive reference by any

> chance? Just ages since I heard that hilarious

> sketch. So wrong!

_________________________________________________


Lb


It sorts the wheat from the chaff it were


Yes Derek & Clive indeed


Remember the "Horse race"




Love that



W**F

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I genuinely wanted to know if she delivered to

> Singapore.

>

> Confectionery here is crap, and those midget gems

> shots got me going.



I don't doubt you Huguenot. My comment was aimed at Woof who has been rather naughty on this thread, even for him, and at Brum, for suggeting some kind of love rival situation. Again, rather naughty.


I tut in their general direction.

I too...


..went in there today "hoping" for a taste of the delicious Miss Hope


Sadly she wasn't to be seen, let alone "licked" ( or she hid under the counter ) either way I bought some " lick-orice comfits " as a substitute


Now if "she " is half as tasty........



"I'LL BE BACK......"



W**F


* sniffs bag *

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...