Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The missing menu on the website is a real blunder - I was looking forward to this opening but not having as large an entertainment budget as I'd like I'm a bit chary of booking without knowing a rough cost or what I might get to eat. If the nice gent who was on here before is still looking I'd say that's a bit of an essential!

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rendell, looking at their Twitter, I think they're

> on a reduced "soft opening" menu at the moment.

> I'm sure once they're doing their full menu, they

> will include it on the website.


Fair enough so, but I'd still say opening a new restaurant these days with a website which has nothing on it but three lines about the type of restaurant it is, directions and a booking form is a bit of an error.

Must still be in 'soft' opening mode, as Mrs Cat tried to check it out for lunch yesterday and it was closed.


The 'fake' review looks like an attemp to perhaps influence internet searches (seo) not just the EDF, as I've seen the exact same review on the hot dinners website.

A new restaurant opens in your area.. What is the first thing you do ?


Yes.. You have a look at their Website..


Where are they.. ?


What's on offer.. ?


Prices.. ?


When are the open.. ?


No website so you pop down to have a look and find it.. Oh it's Closed..


New businesses need to get a basic website up and running BEFORE they open.

Keep their potential customers informed.

Not having a website gives the impression that they do not intend to be around for long.. Like they are just testing the water. ?


The Spinach 'concept' seems a good one that could do well. Just keep us informed.. I'm sure you will.


DulwichFox

Menu online is essential, surely?


Do they have a website? Google only returned a twitter feed and I clicked through on a link from their twitter and my browser wouldn't take me there warning of malware.


Twitter apologies for erratic opening hours, but back to normal hours from tomorrow- which it seems are just breakfast to lunch, with no evening openings.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Menu online is essential, surely?

>

> Do they have a website? Google only returned a

> twitter feed and I clicked through on a link from

> their twitter and my browser wouldn't take me

> there warning of malware.


http://www.spinach.london/ but as above, nothing of any real use on it as yet.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Menu online is essential, surely?

> >

> > Do they have a website? Google only returned a

> > twitter feed and I clicked through on a link

> from

> > their twitter and my browser wouldn't take me

> > there warning of malware.

>

> http://www.spinach.london/ but as above, nothing

> of any real use on it as yet.



hmmmm, that's the link i'm using but am getting this returned


https://malware.opendns.com/?url=www.spinach.london&server=lon16&prefs=&tagging=&nref

Walked by lunchtime.. closed but seemingly some work in progress inside..


Looked at Menu in window.. (No opening times displayed.)


Yellow Sweet Potato Curry ?11.00 rice extra at ?2.50.


?11.00 for potato curry ? Is that good. ? Cheepest main on the Menu.


DulwichFox

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > ?11.00 for potato curry ? Is that good. ?

>

>

>

> I think you have to eat it to find out.


Ok.. You pay for it.. I'll eat it and report back.


Foxy

Foxy is a pensioner


And as I see with my father in law - as one's capacity to earn more money is gone and your income is no longer increasing (other than perhaps a pension being indexed linked to a low inflation level) it seems that its difficult to understand current pricing, when compared to monthly income.


I fully understand this.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haddock with daal and spinach - ?13.50. Lamb

> meatballs - ?14.50. Cod with mussels/clams/stuff -

> ?15.50.

>

> Yes it's more expensive than curry/pizza/etc, but

> not exactly high end.


But in most if not all Indian rests. you get comfy seats to sit on and nice tables...


Foxy..

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Haddock with daal and spinach - ?13.50. Lamb

> > meatballs - ?14.50. Cod with mussels/clams/stuff

> -

> > ?15.50.

> >

> > Yes it's more expensive than curry/pizza/etc,

> but

> > not exactly high end.



>

> But in most if not all Indian rests. you get

> comfy seats to sit on and nice tables...

>



Eh?


Are there no chairs and tables in Spinach then?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But it was under our electoral system in 2019! This must be part of the right-wing media conspiracy that did for Corbyn....;-) Corbyn was very closely allied to Unite and Len....
    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...