titch juicy

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > JoeLeg at what point do you stop and have a word > with yourself? > I've not insulted you, called you any names, > suggested you have a some ulterior motive, etc, > etc. > But you have at me, for no sensible reason that I > can see. > I said what I feel and refused to be painted into > a corner to justify it, because I feel what I feel > and don't have to justify it to anyone, now matter > how abusive they get on the internet. Wow, big > crime. > That seems to make you feel entitled to attack me > and make accusations of superiority or whatever it > was. > And you call that 'robust' ! > Well good for you for being a steadfast internet > poster, I genuinely wish you all the best mate. > Please read this message again, note the absence > of insults, it is possible you know ! > Maybe I'm naive, but if someone starts attacking > someone when they haven't been attacked themself > doesn't that mean they are angry, frustrated, a > bully or something ? Perhaps it's just the > internet 'way' when a poster can't get what they > want. I'm speculating here, I concede that. Look > I don't know but I sure never meet bullies like > this face to face. If you "feel what you feel" irrespective of what anyone else thinks, why post those feelings on a public forum?

I guess a big lesson here is you are approached by youths asking for anything, give them it. Your phone, wallet, bike is far less important than you yourself. Perhaps consider adding cover away from the home to your contents insurance policy too.

A few nights ago in north London my friend filmed a youth going at a moped chain with an angle grinder from her window above their block's car park. The youth fled when he saw the blue lights approaching and left his rucksack behind. My friend pointed out the rucksack but the police wouldn't touch it. When my friend and her friend emptied it, a glass bottle of acid fell out, broke and burnt the paint from the floor markings. Two nights later a large van was back and they were stealing mopeds again This time she called the police (999) and got put in a call waiting queue due to high number of calls. That is truly worrying. Now, as far as I know the acid is carried primarily to burn off serial numbers and distinguishing bits from the mopeds, but are a handy weapon if needed. I believe carrying acid carries a lesser sentence than a knife. The mopeds are stolen to be used for the phone swiping.

Rather than just pointing out who hasn't read the bill, why not point out the relevant bit of the bill that no-one, except you has read?

Dave, would you like to buy some pegs Dave?

As evidenced by the refusal to back up any rhetoric with evidence of how Brexit will benefit us, the only sensible and frankly logical assumption left available is that Keano doesn't actually believe it will. Which begs the question, why does he/she really want us to leave the EU?

Bloody EU criminals coming over here stealing crime from our good honest hardworking British criminals. Also, quoting from the Daily Mail and Daily Record. If finding credible sources is so easy, why haven't you bothered?

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The second part wasn't relevant to titch's > question of EU impositions so I chose a specific > example from the many freely available to people > if they are not too lazy to do some research for > themselves In that case i'm confused why you think them giving us ?26bn a year is an imposition?

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > keano77 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > titch juicy Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > Titch, from the article posted by Alan above as > a > > simple example > > > > Membership of the EU, especially its single > > market, brings with it many rules. Some are > > ill-judged, uncosted and not subject to > > cost-benefit analysis. The working-time > directive > > was a needless intrusion into an issue better > > decided at national level. And regulation > imposes > > costs. Open Europe, a London-based think-tank, > > using official figures, says the annual cost to > > the economy of the EU?s 100 most expensive > rules > > is ?33 billion ($49 billion) a year. > > You've accidentally left off the next sentence, > which reads "Yet regulation also brings benefits, > put in this case by the government at ?59 > billion." It does then say (see this is what you > have to do to quote accurately rather than > selectively) "surely an exaggeration" but those > are the UK government figures. So hold on Rendell, what you're pointing out here is that the regulation Keano has higlighted as an imposition on us by the EU, actually benefits us to the tune of about ?26 billion a year? You shouldn't need to hold Keano's hand through this. I'm sure if he'd read past the headline he'd have known that.

Keano You've been asked over and over and over and over again about ECJ/EU impositions on us, and the ONLY things you've come back with are apples and bananas. God save us all from the evil EU.

Corbyn's view of Brexit is just as unpalatable to me as the one being touted by the other side.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > titch juicy Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > DulwichFox Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > > > > > > Of course other people also eat Pie and Mash. > > > > In their Tower Bridge Rd. Branch, many > > > 'respectable' city types Booted and Suited > > > can be found Tucking in during the week and > > this > > > Bermondsey outlet will be rammed > > > with Millwall fans on Match day." > > > > Respectable city types? You've obviously never > > worked in the city. Just because they're wearing > a > > suit doesn't make them any more respectable > than > > your average builder. Did Dr Who drop you here > > from 1950? > > 'Respectable' was in quotes ?? > > Never worked in the city. ? I worked in the City > for 40 years.. > > Back in the 70's when as Telephone Engineer field > guy, I worked in Customs and Excise, > The Stock Exchange, The Mansion House, Coutes, > Barings Bank, Rothchilds, Plantation Hse. in the > Commodities markets. > > I also worked in Billingsgate Fish Market and > Smithfield Meat Market. > > I met them all. > > DF. I stand corrected and didn't notice the inverted commas around 'respectable'. I should've read more closely.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Johnson isn't keeping quiet. He's told the EU > they can "Go Whistle" for their divorce > settlement > > https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/boris-johnso > n-tells-the-eu-to-go-whistle-on-brexit-divorce-bil > l/# Yes, I posted the same. Also; "We have worked up a 'no deal' alternative in some detail" David Davis 12/06/2017 "There is no plan for 'no deal'" Boris Johnson 11/07/2017

It's beyond hilarious that people still on the leave side are trying to blame remainers for trying to subvert the process. When you have May, Johnson, Davis and Hammond all saying different things. Liam Fox sounds like he sensibly staying out of the way. Omnishambles. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40571123

tarteastdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi there - here's a fairly-comprehensive list of > our current takeaway prices: > > - Vegetarian tart: ?4.50 > - Meat or fish tart: ?4.95 > - Any tart plus any salad: ?6.50 (this is a good > meal - you'll be pretty full) > - Regular tub of salad (250cc): ?3 > - Large tub of salad (500cc): ?5 > - Cake portions start from ?3 (e.g. lemon & > coconut polenta cake) but we have 6-inch cookies > for ?1.75 and pastries are similarly priced > - Coffee/tea sample prices: americano ?2.20, flat > white ?2.40, latte ?2.50, any tea ?2.20 > > Hope this helps! > > Thanks for your support, > Adam Thanks. It looks very reasonable.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Louisa Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I agree, lets now allow the usual suspects to > take > > this thread off topic. So Le Chardon, any > > thoughts? > > > > Louisa. > > I have never set foot in the place. It looks > Nice.. Does not seem too expensive... > But it sells Foie Gras.. > > .. and I have expressed my views on Foie Gras > many a time over the years.. > > It prevents me using several outlets in East > Dulwich and indeed elsewhere. > > Principals have to be adhered too. > > Lets see what the new place will be doing. > > Foxy. But you're happy to eat battery farmed chicken from an Indian restaurant in a mixed grill? *principals have to be adjusted according to my taste/argument* Just fixed that for you Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Of course other people also eat Pie and Mash. > In their Tower Bridge Rd. Branch, many > 'respectable' city types Booted and Suited > can be found Tucking in during the week and this > Bermondsey outlet will be rammed > with Millwall fans on Match day." Respectable city types? You've obviously never worked in the city. Just because they're wearing a suit doesn't make them any more respectable than your average builder. Did Dr Who drop you here from 1950?

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The point was people voted for change. The roots > of this may go back before the Thatcher years but > in areas where the coal pits and factories closed, > for example, nothing replaced them. The > Blair/Brown years and Cameron/Osborne regime > changed nothing. > > Remaining in the EU, as it is currently configured > will change nothing. Germany is booming but nearly > everyone else is chugging along. Spain, Italy, > Portugal Greece and Cyprus are in intensive care. > Migration from Africa will get worse. The EU needs > to integrate more to survive, co-ordinate taxes, > create an army. > > Brexit is the only rational course No, the people voted for an imagined outcome that meant change for the better. The imagined outcome was based on lies and dirty money. The actual outcome will be change for the worse. Not what the people voted for at all. Unlike Joeleg, I believe that brexit could unravel and possibly will not go ahead at all.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can't read it... Ah, the paywall. Here's the text from it. Brexit and the prospect of national humiliation The UK faces a range of uncomfortable outcomes from negotiation with the EU Britain's national pride has made it a tricky customer from a Brussels perspective ? Getty 4 HOURS AGO by: Gideon Rachman Things are going badly wrong in Brexit-land. The UK government is weak and divided. The EU is confident and uncompromising. The negotiation clock is ticking and only the wilfully deluded now believe that a ?cake-and-eat-it? Brexit is on offer. Instead, Britain appears to face a choice between three different types of humiliation. The first humiliating outcome is that Britain becomes so desperate for a trade deal that it is forced to accept the EU?s terms, more or less in their entirety. That will mean that Britain agrees to pay a bill of up to ?100bn in gross terms, merely to get trade negotiations going. To then secure access to the single market, Britain would have to make further humbling concessions ? accepting free movement of people and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. An alternative humiliating outcome would involve Britain refusing to make an agreement on these terms and crashing out of the EU without a deal in March 2019. British goods and lorries would then stack up at the Channel ports, as they hit new trade and customs barriers ? amid general sniggering on the other side of the channel. Job losses would mount in manufacturing and a range of service industries, from finance to pharma. And as investment was diverted to continental Europe, the economy would take a permanent hit. Each of these results will cause dismay and anger in Britain. But there is an argument that a dose of national humiliation can be good for a country A weakened Britain would then turn to Donald Trump?s America, in the hope that the US president would make good on his promise of a ?very, very big? trade deal. But the dream of a proud, prosperous, ?global Britain? would look like a sick joke. The third humiliating outcome involves Britain realising that there is no good Brexit on offer and abandoning the whole idea and returning meekly to the EU fold. Even to secure agreement to this outcome from the EU27, Britain might have to give up its cherished budget rebate. Each of these results will cause dismay and anger in Britain. But there is an argument that a dose of national humiliation can be good for a country. The writer Ian Buruma argued recently that British and American politics have become vulnerable to nationalist self-harm because, after the second world war, ?generation after generation grew up with . . . the feeling of being special?. All of the other big nations in Europe experienced occupation, defeat, humiliation or the collapse of democracy during the 20th century. By contrast, Britain takes a frank and understandable pride in never succumbing, in its modern history, to political extremism or military defeat. However Britain?s national pride, viewed from the Brussels perspective, has made the UK an awkward customer that has never accepted the concessions of sovereignty that are necessary to make the EU work. The Eurocrats murmur that if Britain is humbled by Brexit, that might have a positive effect in the long run, persuading the UK eventually to return to the EU with a more realistic assessment of its own power, and of the benefits of the European project. But is humiliation really good for a country? It is arguable that Britain?s much-prized record of political moderation is connected to the fact that the country has never really been humbled. Angry and confused countries often take refuge in political extremism or aggressive nationalism. The Chinese government has made avenging the country?s ?century of humiliation? (which began in 1839) the centre of a nationalist ideology that its neighbours find increasingly threatening. Vladimir Putin?s sense of humiliation at the collapse of the Soviet Union has driven Russian revanchism in Ukraine and Georgia. Going further back, German humiliation, following defeat in the first world war and the punitive terms of the Treaty of Versailles, contributed mightily to the rise of Hitler. But if post-1918 Germany offers a warning about the dangers of national humiliation, post-1945 Germany demonstrates that being humbled can sometimes be good for the soul. Out of the moral and physical ruins of Nazism, the next generation of Germans built a country that is now rich, stable and widely admired. Fortunately, however badly Brexit goes, it will never be a humiliation to rank alongside responsibility for the Holocaust or occupation by a foreign power. Nonetheless, any of the three possible Brexit humiliations will be a profound blow to national confidence. The resulting public anger is likely to cause a further polarisation in domestic politics. The nationalist right is likely to blame Europeans for allegedly ganging up on Britain and the liberal establishment in the UK for ?selling out the country?. The Corbynite left would also stoke anti-establishment anger, and would use the general chaos to push for a massive expansion in the state ? and a radical realignment in British foreign and defence policy. That, in turn, would provoke a counter-radicalisation by the right. But it also possible to imagine more cheerful scenarios. A country that has made the self-mocking ditty ?Always Look on the Bright Side of Life? an alternative national anthem, might have the ability to shrug off a Brexit humiliation. Stereotypes about Britain?s ?national character? tend to emphasise pragmatism, a sense of humour and an ability to cope with adversity. The Brits may need all of those qualities to cope with the fallout from Brexit.

The FT hitting a few nails on a few heads. I wonder which of the three humiliating outcomes the last few brexiteers would prefer? https://www.ft.com/content/d992b7c0-62fc-11e7-91a7-502f7ee26895

tarteastdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hello East Dulwich! I'm Adam, one of the owners of > Tart, and yes we are indeed taking over Le Chardon > from Robert. My partner and I have eaten at the > restaurant a few times over the last few years but > never did we think that we'd have the opportunity > to eventually own such a beautiful space. We're > excited to open our second shop on Lordship Lane > and look forward to inviting you all in to try our > fare. Before we get to that stage, I wanted to > share our thoughts on a few points you've raised: > > 1) The interior: as mentioned to Yvonne when she > emailed me, our plans for the restaurant are > centred on respecting the history and immense > character of the space. Therefore, while we shall > be updating/fixing the areas that need it (e.g. > the kitchen, painted-closed windows and worn > flooring), we'll also be honouring and augmenting > the historic character of the shop. > > 2) Our menu: at Tart our aim is to make the best > savoury tarts in the business. Not quite a quiche > and not a pie, our tarts are packed full of great > ingredients and held together with the minimum of > custard needed to set them. Our top seller is the > chorizo, roast red pepper, goats cheese, tomato > and pesto tart. My favourite's always been the > smoked haddock, mature cheddar, spinach, > caramelised onion and coarse-grain mustard tart. > We also have a full brunch menu and bake our own > brownies, cakes and cookies. I've attached a pic > of the chorizo tart below and you can see more on > our website here: > http://www.tartlondon.com/gallery > > 3) Pricing: you can take away that chorizo tart > for ?4.95 or avail of our tart and salad deal for > ?6.50, which is very popular in Clapham. Pots of > salad range from ?3 to ?5. Our sit-in prices are > little higher due to VAT. Hopefully you'll find > our menu represents decent value for money. > > If you have any questions or concerns, please let > me know. You can email me directly at > [email protected] or follow us on Facebook at > Facebook.com/Tart and Instagram on tart.london. > Look out for launch promotions closer to the day. > > All the best, > Adam May I just ask please, do you have a list of take-away prices available? The menu on your website just shows sit in prices. Many thanks.

There are good/nasty proseccos just as there are good/nasty champagnes. If i want a summer wine i'll try and find a half decent Provencal rose right now.

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I agree with keano77- the article is biased and > from German so was probably instigated by Merkel > as they are scared stiff that France and Germany > are going to have to make up the shortfall. The > whole tone of Juncker and others is obviously that > of toys being thrown out of the pram. The EU will > NEVER have a reasonable debate- it is so up itself > that it will just carry on demanding. The EU is up itself? Not the UK? The country that decided to leave and then started making demands of the very thing it's leaving.

Sounds like a joy. I didn't realise you could get away with charging ?14 for sausage and mash. I should've opened a pub years ago.

And anyway- to give an informed opinion, perhaps you should listen to both sides of the story, and offer a counter-argument to what's written above.