I say no to Lib-dem

[RosieH]

I suspect this is all a genius double-bluff guerilla marketing campaign on the part of the Liberal Democrats. If anything, surely this thread is warming people up to the Lib Dems, rather than the opposite...

[KD]

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect this is all a genius double-bluff

> guerilla marketing campaign on the part of the

> Liberal Democrats. If anything, surely this

> thread is warming people up to the Lib Dems,

> rather than the opposite...

===========================

Please believe me; I have no faith in the Lib-Dem?s given their poor stewardship of local governance. I would be very unhappy to see them have any influence in parliament.

KD

[evilmanic]

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect this is all a genius double-bluff

> guerilla marketing campaign on the part of the

> Liberal Democrats. If anything, surely this

> thread is warming people up to the Lib Dems,

> rather than the opposite...

Quoting this for utter truth, if anything I was on the fence, now I'm sold.

OP - If they have indeed passed your matter onto their lawyers, then I'd imagine that you will not get a response from the individuals directly and they will have been explicitly instructed not to reply to you, sorry but these are the harsh realities of situations where lawyers and "Claims of ?50,000" are involved.

[katie1997]

I don't think it was a double bluff or particularly genius either IMO and no, I haven't particularly warmed to them regardless.

*Ba-ba-bazinga*

[KD]

evilmanic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RosieH Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I suspect this is all a genius double-bluff

> > guerilla marketing campaign on the part of the

> > Liberal Democrats. If anything, surely this

> > thread is warming people up to the Lib Dems,

> > rather than the opposite...

>

> Quoting this for utter truth, if anything I was on

> the fence, now I'm sold.

>

> OP - If they have indeed passed your matter onto

> their lawyers, then I'd imagine that you will not

> get a response from the individuals directly and

> they will have been explicitly instructed not to

> reply to you, sorry but these are the harsh

> realities of situations where lawyers and "Claims

> of ?50,000" are involved.

==========================================

Unfortunately Southwark think themselves above the law, I already have an admission of guilt from Southwark regarding a issue of unlawful harassment by Southwark against myself they tried to pay me off with a silly ?100.00 cheque that I dually sent back un-cashed. Yes people Southwark Council spending your council tax money, in an attempt to cover up unlawful behaviour by Southwark. If anyone is interested I have all the paperwork on this issue too.

Another little trick Southwark council do is when they do an investigation in to a complaint and you have a set of solicitors on the case, when they issue their complaint finding they send you a copy direct and your solicitors a copy or should I say an alleged copy.

The complaint finding sent directly to me was signed off by Michelle Virtue (SC)

The complaint finding sent to my solicitors was signed off by David Olokun (SC)

Both of the documents were the same except for the sign off names.

But the letter that accompanied the complaint findings to my solicitors claimed that it was a copy of the document sent to me. (Wrong)

I have run this by two firms of solicitor and both have said the documents are worthless, any judge in the land would not allow them in court.

Authenticity of the author could not be established and cross examination impossible.

Dirty tricks by Southwark, they sabotage complaint investigation so that any paperwork that they generate cannot be use in a court of law.

Yes your right I have all the paperwork on this as well

I have so much on Southwark, if there are any reporter out there ? Call me.

KD

[Huguenot]

I suspect, not unkindly KD, that you're an absolute nutjob.

In your situation I think you should be aggravated if the Pope doesn't take a personal interest.

I think you should also remember that this is persoanl, and it's you they're out to get. They talk about you a lot when you're not there.

[KD]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect, not unkindly KD, that you're an

> absolute nutjob.

>

> In your situation I think you should be aggravated

> if the Pope doesn't take a personal interest.

>

> I think you should also remember that this is

> persoanl, and it's you they're out to get. They

> talk about you a lot when you're not there.

=====================================

No I don?t think anyone is out to get me, just aware of the complete incompetence of this council and the breakdown of systems in this city.

I see you too have descended in to juvenile name slinging re: your comment ?nutjob?

Or maybe it?s to early in the morning for you, maybe a cup of coffee before you start critiquing others.

KD

[Huguenot]

;-)

I think the definition of nutjob in this particular sense is someone who thinks the world should vote on a 'Kevin's garden fence' issue and makes a load of unsubstantiated smears on people who aren't even supposed to be representing him.

It's your choice Kevin lad. Either put up or shut up - where's those 'facts'? No facts = nutjob.

[KD]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ;-)

>

> I think the definition of nutjob in this

> particular sense is someone who thinks the world

> should vote on a 'Kevin's garden fence' issue and

> makes a load of unsubstantiated smears on people

> who aren't even supposed to be representing him.

>

> It's your choice Kevin lad. Either put up or shut

> up - where's those 'facts'? No facts = nutjob.

=========================================

Maybe change your pretentious name from Huguenot to (Mr/Ms I am always right)

Sorry, Are post-opp or pre-opp

Because I have heard that the hormone treatment can have side effects, and you are showing classic signs of delusions of grandeur.

We must all look so small to you ? you know, because your so far up there on your high pedestal.

KD

[TJMP]

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KD - I'm familiar with the type of behaviour you have described.

>

> I know of cases where Tessa Jowell, her conservative predecessor Gerald Bowden and Harriet Harman have blanked

> constituents who raised allegations against medical practitioners, lawyers and police officers.

>

> I think most politicians and social elites know whose back to scratch and what to leave well alone.

HAL9000 - That's a serious allegation and, I think, entirely untrue. I certainly have followed up a whole host of allegations against doctors, lawyers and police officers on behalf of constituents. I take the view that if a constituent has raised the matter it should be properly investigated.

If you PM me with details or email me direct - [email protected] - with details of any examples, I will look at them as soon as possible.

Tessa

[jenny1840]

Hi KD , do not waste your time Huge Nought and ???? stretcher are corridor prefects and have a odd smell of biscuits about them. The Liberal Democratic party are the party of Little Britain, basically the BNP masked behind some gutless yellow livery. There politics are that of the student classes and sadly enough it will be more of the same for the electorate if they get any real power in Westminster. I notice the post in the main section where DavidH critised the local MP and got deleted by Admin, i made a comment about the flowers thread and the 2 people killed in the Peckham Rye ward and got deleted and i think blocked from posting. Sadly this forum is beginning to remind of my of the ridiculous leaflets that get posted through are doors, while they all bleat about being green.

[KD]

TJMP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL9000 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KD - I'm familiar with the type of behaviour you

> have described.

> >

> > I know of cases where Tessa Jowell, her

> conservative predecessor Gerald Bowden and Harriet

> Harman have blanked

> > constituents who raised allegations against

> medical practitioners, lawyers and police

> officers.

> >

> > I think most politicians and social elites know

> whose back to scratch and what to leave well

> alone.

>

> HAL9000 - That's a serious allegation and, I

> think, entirely untrue. I certainly have followed

> up a whole host of allegations against doctors,

> lawyers and police officers on behalf of

> constituents. I take the view that if a

> constituent has raised the matter it should be

> properly investigated.

>

> If you PM me with details or email me direct -

> [email protected] - with details of any

> examples, I will look at them as soon as

> possible.

>

> Tessa

-------------------------------------------

Sorry, I have emailed Tessa Jowell MP (a lot) and that?s not her email Address.

KD

[KD]

jenny1840 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi KD , do not waste your time Huge Nought and

> ???? stretcher are corridor prefects and have a

> odd smell of biscuits about them. The Liberal

> Democratic party are the party of Little Britain,

> basically the BNP masked behind some gutless

> yellow livery. There politics are that of the

> student classes and sadly enough it will be more

> of the same for the electorate if they get any

> real power in Westminster. I notice the post in

> the main section where DavidH critised the local

> MP and got deleted by Admin, i made a comment

> about the flowers thread and the 2 people killed

> in the Peckham Rye ward and got deleted and i

> think blocked from posting. Sadly this forum is

> beginning to remind of my of the ridiculous

> leaflets that get posted through are doors, while

> they all bleat about being green.

=========================================================

Hi jenny1840,

Thank you,

Yes I tried posting in main and yes it was deleted, so much for open forum, ha it?s a rainy bank holiday ? got to do something, keeps the little grey cell working.

Thanks

KD

[Huguenot]

You're on a roll here KD! Go for it.

Still no explanation to support your smears, and now you're having a go at Tessa.

[ruffers]

It's been a while since I genuinely laughed out loud at a thread.

Do you remember the Queen Mother's visit?

[KD]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>> In your situation I think you should be aggravated

> if the Pope doesn't take a personal interest.

>

=======================================

And why not.

Given your feed back thus far, it appears you have a direct line to God.

KD

bazinga

[KD]

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been a while since I genuinely laughed out

> loud

>

===============================================================

What happened did you catch a glimpse of yourself in the mirror.

[Siduhe]

KD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Sorry, I have emailed Tessa Jowell MP (a lot) and

> that?s not her email Address.

>

> KD

Are you sure about that? http://www.tessajowell.net/contact_me

TJMP (Tessa and her office) posts quite a bit on the board, maybe have a look at her other posts and make your mind up then...

[KD]

Siduhe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KD Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Sorry, I have emailed Tessa Jowell MP (a lot)

> and

> > that?s not her email Address.

> >

> > KD

>

>

> Are you sure about that?

> http://www.tessajowell.net/contact_me

>

> TJMP (Tessa and her office) posts quite a bit on

> the board, maybe have a look at her other posts

> and make your mind up then...

=================================================================

Maybe I am using the wrong address, I have [email protected]. I have been communicating with her on this one for over a year. But thank you I can add the other one to my address book too.

KD

[HAL9000]

TJMP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL9000 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > I know of cases where Tessa Jowell, ... blanked

> > constituents who raised allegations against

> > medical practitioners, lawyers and police officers.

> HAL9000 - That's a serious allegation and, I

> think, entirely untrue. I certainly have followed

> up a whole host of allegations against doctors,

> lawyers and police officers on behalf of

> constituents. I take the view that if a

> constituent has raised the matter it should be

> properly investigated.

>

> If you PM me with details or email me direct -

> [email protected] - with details of any

> examples, I will look at them as soon as

> possible.

Ms Jowell, I have emailed you with the name of a constituent whose case is relevant to this discussion and is described below. I think it is right that we do not identify the constituent by name on this forum.

In the mid-90s, you were approached by a constituent who had been convicted at the Old Bailey despite overwhelming evidence of having been prescribed massive doses of triazolam by an overseas doctor. Your constituent claimed that medical experts, lawyers and police had conspired to sabotage his defence of involuntary intoxication at trial. You took the case on and appointed a legal advisor to assist in having the case referred to the Court of Appeal. By the time you were approached, triazolam had been banned in the UK for causing acute psychotic episodes at the recommended dosage.

You contacted the then Commissioner for the Met. Police and attended a briefing by senior police officers. Thereafter, you and your advisor dropped the case without any explanation and refused to discuss the matter again.

The allegation is that you chose to side with the conspirators and withdrew support for your constituent?s cause, abandoning him to his fate.

[expat]

Wasn't Triazolam banned in the UK in 1991?

[Loz]

You really must be the life and sole of the party (NOT)

Life and soul (or sole) or otherwise, at least I get invited to parties.

Mind you, I can see an invite from a political party coming your way. Who did take over from Lord Sutch?

[KD]

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You really must be the life and sole of the party

> (NOT)

>

> Life and soul (or sole) or otherwise, at least I

> get invited to parties.

>

> Mind you, I can see an invite from a political

> party coming your way. Who did take over from Lord

> Sutch?

==============================

I can see why you?re invited to parties - every party needs its joker / clown

KD

[louisiana]

KD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TJMP Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAL9000 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > KD - I'm familiar with the type of behaviour

> you

> > have described.

> > >

> > > I know of cases where Tessa Jowell, her

> > conservative predecessor Gerald Bowden and

> Harriet

> > Harman have blanked

> > > constituents who raised allegations against

> > medical practitioners, lawyers and police

> > officers.

> > >

> > > I think most politicians and social elites

> know

> > whose back to scratch and what to leave well

> > alone.

> >

> > HAL9000 - That's a serious allegation and, I

> > think, entirely untrue. I certainly have

> followed

> > up a whole host of allegations against doctors,

> > lawyers and police officers on behalf of

> > constituents. I take the view that if a

> > constituent has raised the matter it should be

> > properly investigated.

> >

> > If you PM me with details or email me direct -

> > [email protected] - with details of any

> > examples, I will look at them as soon as

> > possible.

> >

> > Tessa

>

>

> -------------------------------------------

>

> Sorry, I have emailed Tessa Jowell MP (a lot) and

> that?s not her email Address.

>

> KD

Oh yes it is: during the pre-election period parliamentary email addresses are not valid any longer and incumbents have to provide a different, non-parliamentary email address.

[KD]

We are the Lib-Dem Borg - your culture will adapt to serve us ? resistance is futile ? make your way to the ballot box for Assimilation in to a Lib-Dem drones.