Jump to content

Recommended Posts

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is this so repetitive? Man from the BT

> ads.....x3, 4, 5.....they are blinking actors.


And the repetitiveness is what makes it a thread to be savoured.

Frankly any day that Tim (if I may Timothy) Spall is spotted in The Palmerston is a good day.

It really is.

cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good day for the Palmerston maybe. Sounds like

> they need customers.


And the more the good Tim Spall goes in there, the more they shall have.

I mean, who couldn't like him?

I'm officially nominating him as National Treasure status, actor division.

I know I arse about a bit from time to time, but be assured in this regard I'm sincere.

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fruitytarts Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > what a sorry bunch you are,i cant believe you

> > spend your time talking about famous people in

> > ed,what shallow lifes you must all lead.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>

> Lives. We lead shallow lives.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


:))

fruitytarts Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pleeeeeaaaaaassssseeeeeee get a life.


Got one Fru T.

It's alright enough I suppose, but the lift I would get if I were close enough to a BT/Uncle Ben actor to give them a respectful pinch on the arse, would add to my day immeasurabley.

I would think of it as me giving them an autograph, just for a change.

Though I might well have to do some fancy talking, including a few ten bob words in order to extricate myself from what might turn out to be a bit of a confrontation.

Especially with the BT bloke. I gather he's a bit 'tasty' post-lash.

Or so I've heard.


Any old how Fru T, don't know about you, but I'm gutmans about the Kelly Brooke situation.

I reckon she should go back to Jason myself.


But then I'm a sentimental old fluff.

dulwi1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately until now I have not seen any celeb.

> :( Hopefully this will soon change because I

> really really one to spot someone who is famous.

> That would be so exciting. Hopefully I will be

> lucky soon and if this is the case I will let you

> know.


I don't know about anyone else DulWi1, but I've got everything crossed that you do, soonest.

Just in case it might be James Corden, you do know he no longer counts, don't you?

Melbourne girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw Helen bonham Carter yesterday...

>

> ...in selfridges...i was on my way home - does

> that count?!


Sorry, Helen Bonham-Carter is, I'm afraid not in the running as she's not an actress and is only married to Tim Buxton, who is a cinema manager. Bloody close though.

However, keep 'em peeled, Melbourne Girl.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...