Jump to content

answer please


davidh

Recommended Posts

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's just who recently joined the forum under the

> username KD, seemingly with the sole aim of

> knocking the libdems...


Ho god, not more conspires stories. Please someone bring back Charles hiccup Kennedy.


Sally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, sudden spate of people people joining up with the sole purpose of knocking the forum, with the intellectual rigour and depressing grammar and spelling of your average sixth form debating society (or goose green squatter).

Have our friends in Goose Green been talking to their mates by any chance?


Actually a great deal of political smearing going on. Any of the new posters traceable to millbank towers (or wherever they are now)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sally676 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ruffers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He's just who recently joined the forum under

> the

> > username KD, seemingly with the sole aim of

> > knocking the libdems...

>

> Ho god, not more conspires stories. Please someone

> bring back Charles hiccup Kennedy.

>

> Sally


No, I just thought you might get on. By the way, we're all saying you're paranoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sally676 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Ok so let me see if I got this right, if some one

> says something bad about this forum, what they say

> is automatically a complaint, - right - so we can

> only say good things about the forum.

> So the forum works the same way as the Chinese

> government. Only say good things not bad.

>

> Sally


______________________________________________________


Yes...


Or they'll run you over with a tank basically


( I mean I'm as flat as a pancake now )



W**F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • DulvilleRes...is this correct - did the Chair make that threat?
    • I had one delivered off the back of this thread and would say that, while it's marginally better than the likes of Dominoes and Papa Johns and better value, it's very much in the vein of that sort of pizza. Dough seemed like it had been bought in and is definitely not of the sourdough variety. The sauce was very sweet and overall the flavour wasn't amazing. Not terrible but not a patch on the likes of Yard Sale or more authentic independent pizzerias.
    • The trustees of Dulwich Society reported a huge surge in membership in the weeks leading up to the Special General Meeting. Who these new members were, it is hard to say. However, if the influx was in support of the group of Dulwich Society members looking to extend their influence via the SGM, it failed; they were comprehensively outvoted. Whether co incidental or not, there is a heavy overlap of names between this minority grouping within the Society, and local activists in anti LTN issues. Were they One Dulwich? With an organisation as opaque and unaccountable as One Dulwich are – in stark contrast to the Dulwich Society – it is hard to say. it constantly surprises me that One Dulwich's cheerleaders on this forum seem to know nothing about how they are run, or crucially who funds them. It is hard to take these cheerleaders seriously when they seem unable or unwilling to ask or answer basic questions such as this. I found it extraordinary that this grouping in Dulwich Society pushing for change refused to meet with the trustees to discuss their concerns, opting instead for an expensive Special General Meeting; this indicates to me a certain kind of needlessly combative approach to what is fundamentally an apolitical local charity. This perception was reinforced by the conduct of some supporters of this grouping in the room – hectoring, aggressive and ultimately unneighbourly, and certainly a hostility you wouldn’t want to tolerate in any organisation.  Whilst I can’t talk for the trustees, as regards resigning, if they took the view that actually something extraordinary was happening to much loved local institution that was best dealt with by the Charity Commission, I wouldn’t blame them.  But the end result was in my view a triumph for local democracy. The modernising of the Society’s rules that the trustees supported, giving the possibility of a degree of protection from online trolling for volunteers working on traffic issues, and making the Dulwich Society more inclusive by having the possibility of online General meetings are most welcome.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...