Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I too was quite weepy (gordon and kids. And also at the prospect of a conservative gov. And also poor samatha having to stand there in those heels whilst bearing bump!) Going back to gordon and his leaving performance, I thought it was so lovely and grand but I also thought to myself 'oh my god would i take the chance that they behave???"

bumpy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> littleEDfamily - the agency is Adam & Eve and yes

> the John Lewis marketing guy is an amazing client

> - no I don't work for Adam & Eve or John Lewis but

> we have worked for them on ad shoots. :)


Clearly a person in the know, bumpy - got any good goss?!


Actually I was in John Lewis yesterday, and I have to say, I love that place. I normally avoid the high street at all costs, but there is something very easy and comforting about that store. Their kids stuff is actually not too heinous (I know I shouldn't assume it would be), and they stock a few more 'niche' labels like Green Baby and Organics for Kids.


Incidently, although I like the 'She's always a woman ad', it hadn't made me cry. But, I heard the original Billy Joel song on the radio the other morning and immediately blubbed! It's Billy Joel......'Just the way you are' has the same effect.


Poor old, Gord, hopefully he'll be spending more time with his kids - didn't realise they were so young. Old Sam aint going to be getting much help from hubby.....I wouldn't be happy. PM or not, I'd be on the phone at 5pm saying - "Any idea of what time you may be leaving", shortly followed by getting in a grand old huff!

Ha - I had much the same thought re Sam in her heels - said to my hubby - "her feet must be killing her in those heels with that bump, and he's not likely to be there for the birth is he".


I guess as it is their 4th she will be better placed to just get on with it, but even so......


Molly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...