Jump to content

Labour resignations


bodsier

Recommended Posts

And imagine if you could get the ones that stopped voting interested, or young people to consider. I can't I magine what they'd make of it when they googled *Jeremy Corbin Labour Party*


It's not the sexiest story to make you want to go out and mark the box, with an X for Labour


Or am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We live in very different, surprising and uncertain times and what may have been true a few years ago cannot be used as evidence or a benchmark for what may occur in the future"


Do you have any evidence for that? It's quite a bold statement, and a big risk to take if you are the leadership of a major political party, deciding that its electoral strategy is going to be predicated on getting more voters out, as opposed to taking voters from the other side. JC's stance on immigration isn't going to be pulling many Labour voters back from UKIP.


I'm looking at this as an observer - I'm not voting Labour any time soon, if ever - but I'm a bit surprised that JC supporters seem so optimistic about his ability to win a GE. Sacrificing power for your principles I understand (whether it's a good idea or not is another matter) but there seems to be an inordinate amount of rose-tinted belief that 'everything has changed'. It's surely worth remembering that since the financial crisis the political left in Europe has failed to make any real headway. Obviously if you think the UK is like Greece, you may not agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Left wingers tend to favour hope/optimism over reality/facts - which is why so many times failed socialism still gets the the run out every so often to impoverishment of everyone :)


I'd like PR now - let there be a truly radical socialist party (and I think it's now Labour- which is bit scary given their 'brand strength) but give us something new in the middle so I can vote again ; Clarke (Tory) and Kendall (Labour) are my cup of tea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kendall is too centrist for me (and for those Labour heartlands), but is a hard working MP all the same who has been unfairly attacked, just like any MP who dares to talk about the reality of winning a GE.


My problem with the new left within the party is not so much their idealism, or even their optimism over fact, but their tendancy to see things in a bubble. The centrist MPs they attack, are a reflection of the centist constituencies they represent. There seems to be no acknowledgement of the part the character of a candidate plays in getting elected, especially within marginals. They are calling for deselection of people whose CLPs would never deselect them. I have this argument with them all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DaveR - it's pretty difficult to have evidence when we are venturing into new territory! Circumstances and conditions that create certain outcomes are fluid and constantly changing, especially now. Equally, do you have evidence that contradicts what I'm saying? But as an example, don't you find it different, uncertain and surprising that the UK will very likely be leaving the EU, unthinkable to many of us six months ago?


ETA. I remember all the experts saying, based on "evidence", that the effects of the crash that occurred in 2008 would be over in six months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They are calling for deselection of people whose CLPs

> would never deselect them. I have this argument

> with them all the time.




I think you're right. Take Heidi Alexander. After the work she did for Lewisham Hospital, I would be absolutely gobsmacked if her CLP deselected her. But Momentum would like her gone without a doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"DaveR - it's pretty difficult to have evidence when we are venturing into new territory! Circumstances and conditions that create certain outcomes are fluid and constantly changing, especially now. Equally, do you have evidence that contradicts what I'm saying? But as an example, don't you find it different, uncertain and surprising that the UK will very likely be leaving the EU, unthinkable to many of us six months ago?


ETA. I remember all the experts saying, based on "evidence", that the effects of the crash that occurred in 2008 would be over in six months"


It's a bit too easy to say "how can we have evidence that everything has changed, when everything has changed?"


I guess I would say that the best evidence as to the attitudes and behaviour of the British electorate is history, especially recent history. There was a general election in 2015 that returned a Conservative majority government, when polls predicted a better outcome for Labour and a worse one for the Tories. The polls currently predict a pretty catastrophic outcome for Labour in an immediate GE. Yet you find it easy to believe that there is a groundswell of opinion widespread and numerous enough to return a Corbyn-led Labour govt? Despite the fact that the Labour Party has been very publicly tearing itself apart for the last year.


And to be clear, I was shocked but not surprised by the referendum outcome - when you ask a binary question it's obvious that either answer is possible. And I don't recall any experts predicting that the effects of the 08 crash would be over in six months - apart from anything else, the 'crash' didn't really start until after Lehman in Sept 08. We may disagree on what constitutes an expert, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree ???? and there was a lot to like in what he said. I just wonder though if it was lacking in a bold headline making knd of way. Teresa May has a way of making you feel like she's a safe pair of hands even if the stuff coming out of her mouth is rubbish. Corbyn hasn't got that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've not seen it yet, but sounds as though it was a well delivered speech. Owen Jones, who has been very outspoken against his leadership recently, says he's relaunched his leadership with that.


Other journos say it was a good speech, but won't have really talked to anyone outside of Labour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree ???? and there was a lot to like in what

> he said. I just wonder though if it was lacking in

> a bold headline making knd of way. Teresa May has

> a way of making you feel like she's a safe pair of

> hands even if the stuff coming out of her mouth is

> rubbish. Corbyn hasn't got that.


Didn't Corbyn say she may be able to talk the talk (referring to her speech

outside No10) but no way could she walk the walk as the Tories represent

the privileged few.


Thought that bit wasn't bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Andrew Neal and others commenting on BBCnews24 whilst queuing in Barclays Bank yesterday - the comments were luke warm and when they tried to interview delegates someone who was more cautious was shouted down by another. This behaviour really worries me - let others have their say.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't read too much into delegate interactions to be fair. I also don't expect Andrew Neil to be anything but lukewarm. He will be the same with the Tory conference speeches. Both parties are in the sh*t right now, albeit for different reasons. The Tories are going to fight over grammar schools as much as they are brexit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good article by Philip Collins in the Times today about Momentum, pointing out that the characterisation of the whole group as hard left entryists is way off the mark, and that the party should be trying to harness the enthusiasm. To quote him:


"The only thing wrong with their slogan ?Jez We Can? is the first word."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see him making a comeback into parliament. Which MP would step aside to give him a seat for example? He may come back as a special advisor etc. You also don't have to be an MP to hold some shadow parliamentary positions. I don't think the membership would have the appetite for it. I don't know where the electorate would stand on it though, given Corbyn's unpopularity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blair saying he may make a comeback apparently

>

> He couldn't surely, not after what he's done.


Things like lead Labour to election victories? Corbyn's certainly turned away from those sort of Blairite ideals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...