Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And my motivation isn?t necessarily out of hatred for landlords. They aren?t worth my hate for the most part. It?s is out of concern for their victims. My apologies but unlike most people in this world I give a dam about exploitation and injustice.



And believe me there are victims by the hundreds of thousand around this land and just because people are unaware/out of touch or want to wash over reality in order to appease their own consciences doesn?t change the truth.

The solution is quite simple: in May 1978 Libya passed a law granting each citizen the right to own one house. More than that, property ownership was prohibited. Every tenant became the owner of the house they were renting: social equality at a stroke!

Apparently Article 2 of Law No. 3 in 2004 allowed more than one property to be owned in certain circumstances - including property investment.


However, I'm not sure how that works with rent, as according to the socialist revolution the exploitation of a tenant by a property owner for rent is viewed as exploitation of the 'need' of another and hence counter-revolutionary.


The bulding of new homes was essentially off the back of substantial government petroleum reserves, with a small taxation on government workers.


I can't identify the criteria for housing allocation - it's clear that housing has stratified into apartments, arab houses and villas. There seems to be a degree of housing reflecting government status.


Nor are people obliged to take government housing, they can still buy privately if they wish.


Either way, it's not inordinately effective, since Libya numbers on average 6.5 people for each existing housing unit...

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is that law still in effect?


Essentially, yes. But since sanctions were lifted recently, new initiatives for foreign investors have been drafted allowing limited property ownership that excludes the underlying land - I'm not sure about the details. Perhaps Huguenot can provide a link to his source?


The reason I know about this is because I was in Tripoli when that law was suddenly announced. In particular, I recall the chaos on the roads that day as owners rushed to move their children and relatives into vacant properties before the deadline at midnight using pickup trucks, camels, donkeys, mules and handcarts.


I was amazed at how easily such a radical law was accepted by the population at large.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need a gym to lose 10kg. Get a set of dumbbells and maybe a resistance band, find a HIIT channel you like on youtube and workout in your room, eat clean and go out every day. £115/mo is ridiculous. I thought they were supposed to be about £20 to £30 and most people give up come February anyway.
    • Point taken..I go 3-4 times a week and have done every week for several years however £115 a month is still a lot of money for many people (myself included) for a 'non essential' One can if one wishes excersise by running or Cycling, swimming once in a while. Gym membership IS a luxury...
    • Tawny owls are hooting in Dawsons Heights very near me. But very elusive birds. Sadly now on the amber list.  I have heard the owls every night for the past couple of weeks  It is good to know they are here. They are quite loud so I think they are very near. I have never seen an owl in the wild before and wish I  could  see them. 
    • Hi, looking for a 3-4yrs ski jacket if anyone has one they no longer need or would lend if they want it back for younger siblings in future years! Many thanks 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...