Jump to content

Recommended Posts

signed and shared. The wording is:


'These are troubling times.


Our economy is in chaos. Our politics is broken. The Tories want to set the terms of our exit from the European Union.


This petition calls on politicians from the Labour Party, the Green Party, SNP, Plaid Cymru, the Liberal Democrats and other progressive parties to immediately begin talks about building an alliance ahead of the next election.


Despite what the Tories are now saying an Autumn election is likely. Progressives need to be ready for that.


We the undersigned urge that party leaders begin talks on a progressive alliance, which includes a commitment to proportional representation and an aim of preventing the formation of a Tory-UKIP-DUP government that would seek to enact an ultra-right Brexit.'


I liked it.

A petition? Really? What is that going to achieve?


Wouldn't it be easier just for someone in the Greens to pick up the phone and ring the other party leaders? What exactly is the point of a petition? "Oooh and we have a few 10's of thousand people who have signed a petition, so you have to accept our offer".


On the other hand, it's probably like the useless Amnesty petitions, which are a dishonest excuse to increase their mailing list. Expect a lot of spam and money requests.

I'm sure you're right Loz that the Greens will use the contact details gathered for their own publicity purposes. I think it would be a bit silly of them not to.


However I do see a point to a petition.


If I was in their shoes and picking up that phone I would want to be able to say that I had x thousand people supporting my initiative. It would help with the conversation, don't you think?

"Despite what the Tories are now saying an Autumn election is likely. Progressives need to be ready for that."


Is someone able to clarify why an Autumn election is likely? Whoever wins the Tory leadership, the party has a majority and will not call a general election unless they lose a vote of no confidence. The idea of a progressive alliance is interesting but will not happen as a result of a petition.


PS That Andrea is yet another lightweight, Tory fantasist.

Yep - just read the small print at the bottom...


The Green Party may use the information you?ve given to contact you. By providing your data to us, you are consenting to us making contact with you in the future by email. You can always opt out of communications at any time by contacting us.


Personally, I think petitions like this are more than just a little devious. Especially as you are not given a check box to immediately opt-out.

I signed the petition last week, and I have not been pestered with emails or post.


I take your point about ?really petitions. But I believe that grass roots led action is long overdue and it's not like time spent in chat rooms is going to solve anything.

Don't be daft.

Democracy is no excuse for lunacy or abrogation of responsibility.

Democracy would bring back hanging if given the choice.

Democracy is mob rule, at its most extreme.

And the Tories had way less than 50% of the actual vote at the last GE.

They have a mandate to leave.

They have no mandate at all as to what leave means.

"They have no mandate at all as to what leave means."


Ah, silly me. I thought 'leave' meant to leave!


I should have read the ballot paper as asking do you want to (1) stay; or (2) leave (whatever that means - we don't know)!


"Democracy is mob rule, at its most extreme." - Oh, well you'll forgive me if I don't take your opinion too seriously then!

While I'd be theoretically supportive of a Lab/LibDem/SNP (hell even the bloody Greens) coalition in government, on a shared manifesto point of reversing Brexit, we need to remember that we're talking about politicians. With the amount of back-stabbing, bickering and scheming that goes on internally within a party, can you imagine FOUR of them cooperating in government?

I think the real problem is that, despite the wishful thinking, there won't be a coalition of significant parties standing on a platform of reversing Brexit nor would such a coalition win an election.


Most Tories and many in Labour know that's it now, so can't see Labour in such a coalition without a split

UKIP (in Labour heartlands) and Tories (in their strongholds/marginals) would hoover up votes against a 'get back in' campaign EVEN if Labour ran on it - (see above: they wont)


It's finsihed.



People need a reality check, it's done - now we may get something reasonably near what we were in terms of trade/movement etc (possibly); but we are propa out of what we were in terms of politics/membership

I think it's vital to acknowledge that this is a time of change in many areas of politics.


And while no-one can predict how the picture will pan out, it's always important to work towards a future which you think will be positive and productive. In my experience it's pointless to live your life in any other way. Of course we can all be cynical about what motivates politicians (and my goodness this is - of all moments - a time that reinforces such feelings of cynicism). But if we don't ask them to step up to the plate, who will?


Some years ago we'd have thought it highly improbable that we'd have a coalition government - but that's what we got. That was in far less dramatic times than we're experiencing now.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I should have read the ballot paper as asking do

> you want to (1) stay; or (2) leave (whatever that

> means - we don't know)!

>

>


I think if you'd read the small print, robbin, you'd have found that that's exactly what it did say. That's the reality of the choice that our 'leading politicians' gave us.

Personally, I'd rather the centre-right Tory MPs and the centre-left Labour MPs join with the Lib Dems and create a new centrist party. Leave the true left-wings and the right-wings out in the cold where they should be.


As I said the other day, Labour has always been a coalition of sorts... and that's what has got them to the point they are now. Extending that coalition will probably only fuel the fire.

It's certainly possible Loz. The Lib Dems came about from the old Liberals and the SDP, who in turn were disgruntled Labour MPs concerned about Labour lurching to the far left under Michael Foot and the influence of Militant Tendency (Corbyn/Foot, Militant/Momentum, talk about history repeating itself!), and who also attracted Tories not happy with Thatcher, Tebbit et al...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...