Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Someone wake me up when the hysterical hating has stopped


If his partner had been female he would have perfectly legally, no fraud no anything, been allowed to claim a LOT more for his partner and the flat. As it happened, the law changed several years later and he was faced with the choice of outing himself and his partner for the sake of a technicality.


So yes he ended up breaking the law, but for (IMO) understandable reasons. Had he followed the letter of the law it would have saved the taxpayer not a single dime BUT would have presented the tabloids with lot?s of GAY MP OUTED type headlines so cut the guy SOME slack for cryin out loud


And to dress all this hatred up as faux-morality, concerned taxpayers, blah blah blah ? it?s f***ing sickening



God I hate people sometimes

David Laws resigned his cabinet post after revelations that he used taxpayers? money to pay rent to his boyfriend.


He is a millionaire former investment banker and has a double first from Cambridge. He claimed ?40,000 over eight years to rent accommodation from James Lundie, in a clear breach of Commons rules on expenses.


The rules on the additional costs allowance, which Laws used to claim for rooms in Lundie?s properties, state that the money


?must not be used to meet the costs of ... leasing accommodation from a close business associate, or a partner, or a family member?.


http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Politics/article304022.ece


He accepted his expenses claims were wrong. He apologised to his constituents for ?falling below the standards? they were entitled to expect.


The facts are he was holding a exalted position in public office. He is an intelligent, wealthy man who knew full well what he was doing was wrong, if not downright deceitful. His behaviour cannot be excused. There is nothing hysterical about this.

You aren't repudiating any of the facts I mentioned silverfox - if his partner had been a woman all of this would have gone through due process


No-one, least of all Laws, is saying he DIDN'T do anything wrong - everyone accepts that he did, the law changed and he was required to declare, but prurience and hysteria (yep) are clouding the bigger picture . He made the decision to keep it covered up for the reasons I state above - it doesn't make it right but it does make it understandable. As this isn't costing the taxpayer any money what exactly is the point of it all ?


Given the headlines he would have faced if he had followed the letter of the law, and given it's not costing anyone anything, can you not empathise? It wasn't a deliberate coveting of money - he was entitled to the money but would have needed to declare his partner sexuality with the tabloid fun that entails....

Yes I do empathise and there is a lot of support for his personal dilemma. You're also right to say there has been a lot of schadenfreude about his downfall from many quarters, including the homophobe brigide.


My point though is the British Public are fed up with our leaders adopting one rule for themselves and other rules for the rest of us. The whole row about the expenses scandal wasn't that the politicians had done anything wrong legally - it was that they had granted themselves privileges which allowed them to feather their nests at our expense which was a insult to hard working families struggling to make ends meet. David Laws has been tarnished by this same issue.


This is also why Danny Alexander should do the decent thing and resign immediately. The office of Chief Secretary to the Treasury is about to oversee cuts that will deeply affect all households in the country. How can Danny Alexander introduce punitive changes to Capital Gains tax that he himself avoided and made a decent profit from (albeit technically legally).


There are credibility and legitimacy issues here and it poses the question as to the competence of this coalition partnership in making suspect appointments.

I disagree that Laws has been tarnished with the SAME brush


I don?t doubt that the British People are fed up, but that doesn?t make them wholly correct to complain about everything and conflate multiple problem into one Given the turmoil most people will face in coming years it is going to be all too easy to feed peoples disaffection (be it with politicians, immigrants, the media ? whatever) and it?s time for clear heads and a sense of dealing with stuff appropriatelty and not finding scapegoats.


I don?t necessarily agree that it?s one rule for them and one for us ? whatever that quite means. Clearly it?s easier to manage a relatively small number of MPs on a case by case basis and see what common sense actions need to be taken


When it comes to Joe Public, it depends on the size of the institution ? if you are being dealt with by a small outpost of government, with some autonomy, then chances are that you may well be excused ?inncuracies? which might otherwise be a problem. But given the sheer scale of the taxpaying public, it isn?t feasible to look into or make a case for everyone making mistakes to be ?excused?. There are also a hell of a lot of Joe Public trying to defraud the taxpayer and the system in place has to deal with sheer volume ? THAT is the reason for the less flexible attitude to ?us? ? not some invisible divide


Sometimes, a stroppy child or partner who has been moping around the house whining ?s?not fair? needs to have a look at themselves and stop worrying about Tommy down the road and what HIS parents let him do.


MPs do a hard job, beyond the scope of most of us and get payed relativly (given the hours, the stress, the responsibilities and expenses) small amounts to do so. I?m glad expenses are more transparent and I?m glad that culture will be gone, but ultimately it?s neither here nor there ? a diversion.. a fireworks show for masses to complain about. The overall cost to the taxpayer is infintessimaly small and irrelevant ? but we risk throwing the baby out with the bathwater because of the media witchunt


We should be better than this

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But at least he's fallen on his sword (excuse

> the

> > pun!!)


> What?! This either makes no sense or is offensive

> and I can't quite be sure which...


Well - you know! He's GAY, isn't he?! So basically it's just gotta be about cock, cock, cock all day long, like all homosexuals - right?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > dbboy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > But at least he's fallen on his sword (excuse

> > the

> > > pun!!)

>

> > What?! This either makes no sense or is

> offensive

> > and I can't quite be sure which...

>

> Well - you know! He's GAY, isn't he?! So basically

> it's just gotta be about cock, cock, cock all day

> long, like all homosexuals - right?



Right. Astonishing isn't it?!

SeanMacGabhann wrote:- We should be better than this



So should those MP's doing such a hard job which is no doubt beyond the scope of most of us too,


they made up their own rules and then they break them.


They also make up the rules for us,


but if we transgress and break those rules we are punished by the law, we either do time in gaol, or are fined.


Why should the transgressions of their rules not be punished by the same law?


When they pay back what they should never have taken in the first place, and resign, that seems to be their punishment,


why are they not fined or imprisoned like the rest of us would be on this forum?


Is it because he is gay he is exempt, or because he is a very wealthy, and very clever politician?


I am only asking out of ignorance as I do not understand how the system works,


but I do not expect anyone to get all heated about it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...