Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My little one is almost 6 months and I'm really confused as to what sunscreen is safe to use on him. Having read so many articles, I know you aren't supposed to use anything until they're six months, but then, there's a whole load of conflicting advice as to which sunscreens (even the organic and natural ones) are safe to use and from what age!


We asked the Health Visitor yesterday and to be honest she was as clueless as I was. If anyone can point me towards something that is safe to use on small babies, I would appreciate it.


Px

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11621-sunscreen-for-babies/
Share on other sites

As well as find a suitable sunblock I think the general advice for a baby of this age is to just keep them out of direct sunlight. A sun protector for the buggy, a hat and light long sleeve clothing would be your best bet. It is much easier to keep them out of the sun at this age as they are not yet mobile. Once they are on the move it does get a little more difficult.
Currently sat under a shady tree in the park as I type!! We do obviously cover up and stay out of the sun as much as possible but we often find ourselves cheering daddy on at triathlons etc where shade is pretty non existent. I have some Ambre Solaire kids stuff I might just try this weekend. I agree you can read too much!!!
You can read too much and pay too much - picked up 2 tubes of kids sun screen at Health Matters the other week and almost keeled over when I went to pay. I bought them in the end but I'm still asking myself if it really is any better than your standard ambre solaire / nivea etc. I'm trying to tell myself it is so I feel better but having survived years of the basic ones myself as a kid, I suspect it probably isn't that justified.

Couldn't agree more Nunheadmum. As a kid growing up in NZ we just got smothered in whatever suncream was at hand, Mum was surprised when I was there a couple of months ago to see that there were specific "kiddy" suncreams - apparently that wasn't the case when I was small. Mum talks fondly of the "turnover time" jingle that was played on the radio every 15 minutes to ensure your tan was even ;-)


I've just ordered some new cream for the kids from Avon, a lot cheaper than even the Nivea products, but with the same SPF.

Thanks Keef. Now I think about it you can buy a little bit of fabric for our travel cot that converts it into a sunshade tent thing. I've ordered one which will hopefully be here in time for this weekend. That, combined with a bit of Ambre Solaire, a hat, sunglasses, long sleeve thin top, comfy linen pants, sun cover for the buggy and we should be fully protected. I hope he doesn't get rickets from the lack of sunshine now!

Agree about suncreams.....BUT my eldest comes up in a rash if I use cheaper highstreet brands (even kiddy ones), but is fine with the Health Matters or Sun Sense brands - the latter I can actually get for her on prescription but I use so much I tend to buy myself as seems wrong to keep getting endless amounts that way.


Interesting to note that something in the main brands really does upset her skin, be it parabens or something else.


M

Same here Molly - my youngest reacted last year and seems to have a constant rash from excema so playing it safe. But I know I react to some normal brands while I don't with others so I probably could find a cheaper option for her too. But can't help playing it safe when she's still little.


Interesting to hear that you can get some on the NHS. May have to try that option if it's a good summer as keeping up (particularly with nursery usage) at the prime prices will bleed me dry!

Ditto with nappy lady...we used Nivea Kids last summer, when away in Menorca, and our boy was 12 months. He reacted quite badly and suffered with a rash all over. Before that we had used the sun cream that they sell at Jojomamanbebe (can't remember the name as it is in his nursery bag). We also use Proderm Technology, which is a sun mousse for kids, 30SPF and he loves to apply it at 21 months with the frothy foam.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...