Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Moved down from the NW many moons ago. Kept a terrace up there with a long term let to a family. Should have cashed in years ago. When vacated had to spend several grand on repairs and a refresh. Couldn't sell so let it through the Estate Agents who also managed the tenancy. Tenants did a runner a week ago leaving rubbish and lost of damage after only 5 months.


What was the point of using an agent? Was the vetting carried out properly? Did they regularly inspect the property. Not getting much sense out of them.


Be interested in hearing good and bad experiences of letting agents. Note this is not in London, rents are a quarter, hence agents have lower income and probably pay for lower caliber of staff. No abuse of BTL landlords please - I've had enough abuse from tenants!

If the rent is paid, and there are no complaints from neighbours or the council, then there would be no reason to inspect the property outside the terms of the lease (usually when re-signing a renewal, for gas check etc).


Otherwise tenants are considered to have the right to privacy and 'quiet enjoyment' of the property, without undue intrusion by the owner or letting agent.


The legal requirement for management of the property should be outlined in the agreement you have with the letting agent.


Sorry you had a bad experience, hope it's sorted quickly. xx

you should check references of previous accommodation, references for ability to pay (check if arrears with previous landlord), take a deposit to cover any damages, undertake regular inspections


Agency would really only provide the tenant (you'd want to check what references they take) and/ or be available for any maintenance, collection of rent - this depends on your agreement and what you're paying them for.


I've also been stung by nasty tenants.

All you need to know about agents is contained in one piece of small print in just about every agreement. That is the bit that says that, even if the tenants fails to pay the rent, you still have to pay the percentage agreed for management.


That's sums up the lack of confidence they have in their own service.

Rosetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the best thing is to go for landlord insurance; the company does all the checks on the

> tenants. Join the National Landlord's Association for help.


All the LL insurance I've seen doesn't do any checks. They do, however, demand you do them if you want rent cover.

Thanks all.


It just took me by surprise, having seen a wide range of tenants in the past.


I used to deal with students years ago, having once been one myself I thought that I would know what to expect. Surprised at times, but many of the surprises were good ones.


I hadn't expected this from a 'profesional' person with a kid who'd supplied all the references etc.


As for tenancy agreements and 'quiet enjoyment' I always gave notice of visiting and 99% of the time this was fine. Ho hum.

Too far away to manage reliably. Crappy local estate agents on small time commission + bad tenants is not a good combo. You need to either take greater interest in tenant selection, be involved and meet them yourself or sell the place and cut your losses. You CAN sell it just perhaps not at the price you'd like but there's no shame in taking a hit, licking your wounds and moving on without the hassle of owning it. Then unless you're in negative equity use any gains to pay off your existing mortgage or invest it in an index tracker fund which will likely help you get money back over long term. BTL no longer makes sense with new taxes.


I would just sell it mate and move on.

I don't agree that BTL doesn't make sense with the new taxes, maybe so for newcomers or those poorly leveraged.

Why don't you speak to an accountant and look at your options, find out what the tax implications are if you continue to rent, what your CGT liabilities are if you sold etc...

Hmmmm a quick sum tells me BTL only really works if you have 60%+ equity, a gross yield greater than about 7%, a low BTL mortgage rate and perhaps a corporate structure to run it through. Losing mortgage interest relief is massive for many amateur LL's.

I don't think this is the thread for a boring debate on the impact of BTL in London which has seen a leveraged minority prosper at the expense of the less wealthy, non-property owning masses and widened the gulf yet further between the haves and have nots. And I say that as a former BTL landlord who benefited. My view is that given the impact on society second properties should be more highly taxed and not allowed to be just another asset class like bonds or equities.


Anyway...Malambu...sell that flat in Liverpool bro

Been trying to sell it for two years thanks. Put tenants in as otherwise I'd continue to pay council tax and the place would have got damp. There is only so much of a hit you can take. Surely some of you have kids going to Liverpool to study - here is a great chance to save on rent!


It's a rather sad state of affairs. Some lovely housing stock but depopulation from the 70s coupled with loss of manufacturing has hit hard. Its still a lovely place but many of the middle classes rather than move to the equivalent of East Dulwich would rather move out to Cheshire or the Wirral. BTL and purpose built halls have saturated the student market.


Not after a sympathy vote just explaining that outside of our London bubble the world can be very different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...