Jump to content

Recommended Posts

English is spoken by the uSA by what is the biggest (still) economy in the world and is also culturally dominant through TV and film. It is also the language of computing, aviation and international commerce.


English is a common language spoken across India, a rapidly growing economic presence.


It is a real dogs breakfast of a language. It shamelessly and joyously takes and adopts new ways of communicating, new words, new syntax. It is a little bit german, a little bit french, a little scandinavian, a little bit indian, a little bit latin, ad nauseum.


Indian english is different from American english which is different from Scottish english and so on and on. People can use english in their own way and do dont feel that the adoption of english makes them a victim of linguistic imperialism.


The strength of english is that it is not English.

  • 3 weeks later...

baroldmc, I've already explained why it's Great Britain ad nauseam...


Some of the original kingdoms that historically included these islands also included large tracts of North West France - now known as Brittany.


'Great' Britain was used to differentiate what is now England/Scotland/Wales from 'Lesser' Britain in what is now France.


It has nothing to do with being powerful.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it would be a great thing, mainly because

> I speak English.

I think we should only have one currency too!


America almost became a German speaking Nation. When put to the vote I believe English won by 1 vote.


English won - by a single vote, because one German-favoring guy was sitting on the toilet.


A bit of an Urban Myth.. http://www.watzmann.net/scg/german-by-one-vote.html


Bit of fun though.




A Single Currency. ??

Well they could not get it to work in Europe (23 Countries) let alone the whole World. (257 countries)


Fox.

  • 3 months later...
English is becoming the main common language but will not take over completely. Other nationalities make an effort to maintain their own language and value it more dearly, particulalry those un the UK with Engish as a second languge. For them English is merely a tool enabling them to access financial security through education and work. For socialising/family/news media/TV/movies/current affairs, its all done in their mother tongue with a few English/ameericanisms thrown in. Second generation immigrants have something few 'English' people have - access to fluency in other languages enabling them to have the best of both worlds. By building a wider skills set, they use their bilingual abilities to create internet sites, make movies, do business in other select languages - those with only one language will certainly lose out in the future. No time to be smug, learn another language, quick!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • and when it's such a small increase, it doesn't really matter, does it.
    • I’m not trying to say anything.  I’m explicitly citing the example of the party with most to gain by saying “councils waste money.  We will go in and bust that whole nonsense up!” Only to go in and go whoops. We need more money not less ive deliberately posted a link to a sympathetic (to them) news outlet specifically so no one can go “well the guardian would say that”   why try and hypothesise? 
    • Marveling at the chutzpah of Brexit supporters wanging on about a 4.99% increase in council tax which equates to circa £94/year for the average Band D, whereas it's conservatively estimated* that Brexit has cost each UK household circa £1k/year.  At least with council tax there are actual tangible benefits e.g. weekly waste clearance.  *Based on BoE report 2023...
    • so to summarise, "Party X is stating that Council Y is financially inefficient and saving can be realised or efficiencies made, but when the exercise has been completed, it was found that no savings were achievable". I don't know if you are trying to say that has happened or that if it does happen, that is what would happen.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...