Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I bought a new build flat on the East Dulwich Estate from Southwark Council just over a year ago. After about 6 months I noticed that considerable gaps were appearing around the edges of the floor where there had been any weight, such as furniture or even objects that weren't too heavy like my computer. The gaps are where the floor meets the skirting board, in effect the floor has sunk around the edges. Also there are areas of unevenness across the floor. I went back to Southwark with this problem and they did nothing. I went through the CAB to raise a Stage 1 complaint. After a lot more correspondence and a couple of meetings it was suggested that they replace the beading to cover up the gaps with no further investigation offered as to what may be happening underneath the floor.

Has anyone had similar experiences with these flats or has anyone advice to offer?

Thanks.

Hi jazzeyb,

In your shoes I would contact my building insurer for them to comment.

This must have a cause and you need peace of mind it's not a problem.

Equally you could ask a local councillor for support - they would ask officers for a copy of any technical report reassuring you and them not a substantive problem.

If it is laminate flooring it should be fairly easy to take up a few bits to take a peek at what is underneath. Most purpose built flats tend to have concrete hardstanding between floors - our purpose built 1930s flat certainly has as did the 1980s ex council flat we lived in before.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's regrettable that impact of the various topics of immigration have escalated to the level that people have to protest their unhappiness and that laws have to be rewritten, and yet people complain that those protesting are racist.       
    • I remember in the 70s the Union Jack was similarly appropriated by the National Front and later the British Party, I regarded it in the same way many perceive the St George's flag today. The Union Jack went through a period of rehabilitation in the 90s and probably viewed more positively by the left today. I wonder though if the anti immigration groups who have appropriated the St George;s flag realise that St George was born in what is modern day Turkey.
    • Certainly there are issues with  immigration which need to be addressed, but setting fire to buildings with immigrants in them is not the way to address them. Many (not all) of these people are fleeing from terrible situations in their own countries, and I can't even imagine what it must be like to finally reach somewhere where they hope they will be safe only to be "greeted" with violence and hostility. It makes me ashamed to be English, not proud. And yes, some of these people are here illegally, some of them are criminals or perpetrate attacks on women or whatever. And are dealt with accordingly. I read recently, and I don't know if it is true, that over 60% of the men arrested at the scene of attacks on immigrants and their temporary homes have previous convictions for  or are known to the police for domestic violence. Maybe look at yourselves first, eh, before trying to imply that because a few  immigrants commit a crime here therefore they are all criminals and shouldn't be allowed into our country. Why would someone fly the English flag in the present climate for any reason apart from being anti immigration?  What is a very unhealthy view? Are you replying to me? Yes the immigration law badly needs to be amended. I completely agree. I don't think I've said anything which implies otherwise?
    • That’s a very unhealthy view.  Particularly when the very top echelons admit that the immigration law is out of date and not relevant and is being amended as we speak.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...