Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Any one stopping at a junction during rush hour over the last couple of years will observe the incredible increase in the number of cyclists as they whiz past those selfish sods who sit in their fancy cars, stationary, held up by hundreds of other unenlightened commuters who refuse to recognise that when it works London's transport system could eliminate the need for these vehicles which pollute the air, increase the amount of respiratory disease and kill pedestrians and cyclists by the dozen. This is the 21st century time to forget the idea that we have the right to congest cities and destroy the air quality. Cyclists keep themselves fit, save time and can enjoy wonderful views of London that others never see. Most experienced cyclists that I know avoid main roads and traffic. Even Boris is on the side of the Bicycle, more cycle lanes, less car domination of our roads and shopping areas.


The Horizon Deepwater ecological disaster is caused by the demand for the fuel to keep people on four wheels. Now repeat after me: Two wheels good, four wheels bad!

Belladonna...........


3 points:


1. Motorbikes use petrol so it's not just 4 wheels!

2. it's bad enough avoiding cyclists when trying to cross the road when there's a green man as it is now, we don't need more colour blind cyclists on our roads trying to kill us!

3. Boris is a crazy MOFO - hardly your best advocate for promoting something!


I thank you

Steve....


1. motorcycles use considerably less fuel and subsequently produce considerably less pollution than most cars.

2. Pedestrians think nothing of walking over a pedestrian crossing even when the its displaying the "Red man". This happens to me when i cycle on a daily basis. Pedestrians are colourblind too.

3. Fair point

Shankley...


1. Agreed, but they still do use fuel, as long as there is a demand, then the drilling will still happen!

2. True, but a bike travelling at 10 mph hitting a person is gonna hurt an innocent pedestrian, if someone walks out in front of a bike then that's there problem, Darwin and all that!

3. At least we agreed on 1 point :-)

When it comes to road use everyone perceives the road to be theirs. It's not. It's public property. Peds, Cyclists, Bikers, Drivers alike.


Chill out people. You will live longer. :) That goes double for you Louisa!!! LOL...



p.s. the two wheeler always wins when it comes to commuting from Dulwich to the City.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Seems to be lot of words to say parents should be supervising their children properly and adults should not be cycling on pavements. 
    • There are two causes for this problem   The first is that modern safety requirements for cars (to protect pedestrians and cyclists in collisions) mean huge amounts of excess spacing in crumple zones to provide a cushion on impact. For example, in the past a lot of pedestrians suffered catastrophic head injuries when they ran in front of a car, because the bonnet was close to the engine block, so their heads bent the bonnet into the solid immovable engine and their heads cam off worse. To mitigate that there is now a huge amount of flex and space so that the head is cushioned from the engine. Naturally, the rest of the body work and car frame has had to increase to accommodate this safety measure.   The second issue is electrification.   Electric cars are massive because they have to carry huge batteries around to make them work. Massive amounts of space and height is given over to batteries in electric cars. The new electric Renault 5 (described as a "compact" hatch back) is nearly 4 metres long 2 metres wide.    That makes it longer and wider than the original Range Rover. 
    • Pretentious status vehicles.  Last year I was trying to drive down my own street but, being in a little, inferior car, was expected to make way for a stream of SUVs / Chelsea tractors as they barged along beside me. After what felt like an age, I saw a window of opportunity, but was beaten to it by yet another tank. By this stage I was irate (I hate the things) and having a full on shouting match with myself behind the wheel.  A Tesla in the oncoming queue pulled in, flashed and courteously allowed me to take my moment. The Tesla's windows were tinted, but not so much that I wasn't able to make out the driver, as I passed him. I'd recognise that mega-watt smile anywhere. It was Peter Crouch, laughing and giving me the thumbs up, clearly entertained by my tantrum. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...