Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Any one stopping at a junction during rush hour over the last couple of years will observe the incredible increase in the number of cyclists as they whiz past those selfish sods who sit in their fancy cars, stationary, held up by hundreds of other unenlightened commuters who refuse to recognise that when it works London's transport system could eliminate the need for these vehicles which pollute the air, increase the amount of respiratory disease and kill pedestrians and cyclists by the dozen. This is the 21st century time to forget the idea that we have the right to congest cities and destroy the air quality. Cyclists keep themselves fit, save time and can enjoy wonderful views of London that others never see. Most experienced cyclists that I know avoid main roads and traffic. Even Boris is on the side of the Bicycle, more cycle lanes, less car domination of our roads and shopping areas.


The Horizon Deepwater ecological disaster is caused by the demand for the fuel to keep people on four wheels. Now repeat after me: Two wheels good, four wheels bad!

Belladonna...........


3 points:


1. Motorbikes use petrol so it's not just 4 wheels!

2. it's bad enough avoiding cyclists when trying to cross the road when there's a green man as it is now, we don't need more colour blind cyclists on our roads trying to kill us!

3. Boris is a crazy MOFO - hardly your best advocate for promoting something!


I thank you

Steve....


1. motorcycles use considerably less fuel and subsequently produce considerably less pollution than most cars.

2. Pedestrians think nothing of walking over a pedestrian crossing even when the its displaying the "Red man". This happens to me when i cycle on a daily basis. Pedestrians are colourblind too.

3. Fair point

Shankley...


1. Agreed, but they still do use fuel, as long as there is a demand, then the drilling will still happen!

2. True, but a bike travelling at 10 mph hitting a person is gonna hurt an innocent pedestrian, if someone walks out in front of a bike then that's there problem, Darwin and all that!

3. At least we agreed on 1 point :-)

When it comes to road use everyone perceives the road to be theirs. It's not. It's public property. Peds, Cyclists, Bikers, Drivers alike.


Chill out people. You will live longer. :) That goes double for you Louisa!!! LOL...



p.s. the two wheeler always wins when it comes to commuting from Dulwich to the City.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would imagine that the evidence shows that protein powder is not suitable for under 18s whatever the brand.  Staff should’ve known that.
    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...