Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A wall is being erected close to where I live. It puzzled me as I'd just recently received a letter from the council advising me permission was being sought to do this. The consultation period ends in July sometime. I have no particular objection to this wall but thought I'd mention it to the chap building it whose response was 'I don't speak English'. Undoubtedly all he knows of the language, except for in the pub possibly. He is no different to me being abroad in most places when that's the minimum I try to learn of the local language.


Are there any moral issues I should be addressing here? I could report it to the council and they would probably have to take down the wall, but my foreign friend could be out of pocket. Would you do anything? If so.....why?

I would be inclined to report it. It may only be a wall, but the principle is the same as The Concrete House.


In my experience, people who bulldoze through planning laws/protection orders, pretty much know what they are doing.


A farmer I knew chopped down loads of protected trees to increase his tillage and thought that a fait accompli would be on his side - he ended up with a jail sentence.

If he has enough nous to file a planning application, he knows what he is doing.


It is a common habit in much of Europe never to apply to build anything, but just to do it, and to regularise it afterwards at best, (sometimes bribing a local official to do so), or perhaps not even to bother to do that.


We should discourage the adoption of these anti-social habits in the UK, which can have downright dangerous consequences for many people.

that wall could fall down and kill somebody if it's not checked over by building control.


That old "precautionary principle" again. I hate it. Do you really believe that the average journeyman brickie, UK born or foreign born, cannot build a decent wall for a customer without Government or local government oversight?

I built a shed in my garden and it wasn't very long before Southwark council wrote to me to say that an illegal structure had been erected and would be sending someone to check it out.


I never new planning permission was, or might be, necessary for a shed,

they (Southwark) came to visit, and the inspector of sheds arrived with a long tape and measured from the highest point of my erection down to the ground, and said that it was possibly alright but had to make sure with the director of sheds and other erections and I would get a letter.


I still have that letter as it could have instructed me to remove my erection, but in fact it said that my erection was allowed in the garden, and we all lived happily ever after.


Now my point here is, if you don't care about the wall fuggedaboutit,

but the rest of us are having to play by the rules, so what makes these people who have the audacity, temerity,

thickness of hide, and pride in their own ignorance of not knowing how to speak English, special cases.


Send a letter to the planning department asking if this is the case, that someone who does not speak English does not need planning permission and you might meet the inspector of walls, or even the director.

...erection ... erections ... erection ... erection


... but the rest of us are having to play by the rules, so what makes these people who have the audacity, temerity,

thickness of hide, and pride in their own ignorance of not knowing how to speak English, special cases.



You said erection! *sniggers*


Bloody johnny foreigner, coming over here with his bricks and his 25 wives and his knedliky, gah...

Just to clarify my original post. I have no doubt my foreign friend is working under instructions. However if he misunderstood those instructions and started building the wall before he should have, then no doubt he would be penalised if it was reported and the wall had to be taken down. As I have no objection to 'the wall' anyway, I see no reason to report it. I just wondered if there were other issues to be considered.

My ex mother in law bought the cottage next door to her and got all the relevant permissions to knock through and make one larger house..


She also demolished the wall between the gardens...


Being an enterprising chap, I collected the considerable amount of rubble and constructed a (if I do say so myself) rather elegant patio area and BBQ.


Of course the wall was listed as well as the properties it divided and all sorts of people turned up and promised dire consequences for the wanton destruction of an historic but rather plain wall.


I did contemplate inviting them to my house to relist the BBQ now in situ with wonderful 1790's brickwork, but thought it might put their noses out even further.

mothernature Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Report it first thing Monday morning.


Well I'm glad I didn't do this. I was wrong. Checking my facts I saw that two buildings next door to each other had applied for permission. The one where the work has been done was already granted it. The other one hasn't started yet. Oops, sorry!

a wall that forms part of a boundary is (I believe) exempt. A wall that forms part of a structure is not.

It all comes down to foundations. If they dug a 5ft deep hole first, its a building. If they dug a trench and filled it with concrete, its just a wall.

If you call southwark and report the wall then an enforcement notice could be issued. However, on the basis that a planning application has been submitted Southwark Council will not be required to enforce any action until this has been determined. A lot of people apply for permission retrospectively at their own risk. If planning permission isnt granted then the wall will need to be removed at the applicant's cost (subject to the outcome of any possible appeal which they could submit).


Im not sure reporting it will do much good at this stage. Best bet is to keep an eye on whether the application is approved and if not then report it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The original post was made by someone else, not the person whose post I was replying to! And the original post only mentioned Whateley Road (which has been clear of leaves whenever I have walked down it) and another unspecified road. My question was directed at CPR Dave, who (as was clear in the post I quoted)  said "The streets round here are a disgrace".
    • We had a delivery from Matoom last week. Sadly, as I had high expectations, especially as it wasn't cheap, I was underwhelmed. To start off with  positives, the corn cake starter was ok, and my partner said his green curry and coconut rice was tasty. I  (unadventurous I know but I wanted to do a direct comparison with Chern Thai) had Pad Thai (with tofu and veg). There was a lot of it, which was good. So much that I had half of it cold for breakfast the next morning. However, it was almost completely noodles, with hardly any veg or tofu. In fact there was so little tofu I don't actually remember eating any.  I do remember thinking that the stirred in egg must be some kind of tofu. I'm wondering now whether they were busy and forgot the tofu altogether! As it didn't come with peanuts (which I knew in advance as they weren't mentioned on the menu) I ordered a peanut sauce (?) separately, though I can no longer see this on the online menu. This didn't really help much taste wise  For comparison, we both had Pad Thai for lunch yesterday (Saturday) at Chern Thai, with gyoza to start. The Pad Thai was fantastic, good sized portions with lots of tofu and several different kinds of  really fresh lightly cooked vegetables.  The gyoza were also excellent, just the right amount of crispiness and with a good amount of dipping sauce. The meal  was also very well priced. I realise it's not very fair to directly compare the price of delivered dishes to dishes from  an eat-in lunch menu, but in terms of overall value it was much better. And the service was lovely. In case our Matoom delivery  was a one off glitch, we will book a table and eat in there, but so far I am disappointed. ETA: Just realised this thread is about BYO. Chern Thai used to be solely BYO, but it now has a full drinks menu with Thai beer on draught and  wine. You can still BYO, but there is a charge. We had jasmine tea, which was very nice.
    • Hi Angelina - whilst I’m not close enough to this decision (as a candidate not a councillor), I would hope there will be public consultation if this situation arises again next year. As a local resident, I will push for this, if I do become a councillor. Hello - I will ask for this to be updated as soon as possible, as I appreciate people will be looking for this info!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...