Jump to content

Recommended Posts

An international team of paleontologists has uncovered the earliest known multicellular fossils, pushing back the fossil record for such lifeforms to 2.1 billion years ago and suggesting that they lived 200 million years earlier than scientists had thought.


http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-fossil-20100701,0,2900726.story




http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2010-06/54680753.jpg

Actually, there is a some doubt about whether these are multi-cellular fossils. Some scientists say they are just as likely to be conglomerations of single-celled organisms much like the microbial stromolites that had already been around for over a billion years by then.


The big question is whether the new West African specimens truly represent large organisms growing in a co-ordinated manner, or are merely a record of the remains of aggregations of unicellular bacteria. -- 'Cookie-shaped' fossils point to multicellular life

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd rather go to actual local Safer Neighbourhood Team meetings and see the whites of their eyes.  Ours in Peckham Rye Park ward (maps of areas the ward covers are on the police website; no idea about the new one!) used to be very well attended, but sadly now not so.  The local police of the SNT seem to change far too regularly so they never have a chance to really know the area and the people.  And the last meeting, held at the Tenants Hall of Brenchley Gardens (so right on the edge of the geographical area), was held with one day's notice.  Not good.
    • Friends of Peckham Rye Park sent emails to its members (do join if you can; it's useful) saying a few nights ago a fire was started on the SE22 side of the park by kids with fireworks.  Horrific.  
    • No One Said It  Was  However spending money you haven't got and increasing national debt is not a great way to run a country now is it ? Or has common sense left you 🤔 
    • Running a country is not the same as a household budget  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...