Jump to content

Let's rewrite the rules of football........Proposal # 3


Recommended Posts

The Penalty Box - Lets do away with the penalty box.


It is a simplistic concept that a player fouled in the box deserves a goal as a compensation - Currently any foul in the box will result in a penalty (likely a goal) whether there is a scoring opportunity or not. To give a goal where there is no scoring opportunity seems wrong.


Rugby referees are allowed to award penaly tries where a try was likely to be scored irrespective of where the infringement happens on the pitch.


Lets do away with the penalty box and only award a penalty if the attacking player is in possession and in a position where he has a real goalscoring opportunity, irrespective of where he is on the pitch.

I saw a penalty awarded to Deco a few years ago whe he played for Porto - he was in the penalty area but running away from goal and about to exit the penalty area when fouled - was fouled and won penalty and therefore a goal. This all arose from a position where he was running away from goal and in no way was there a threat of scoring a goal, so how is a penalty/goal a fair result.

Not many - sensible afternoon BBQ.


I have just sent a PM to Sepp Blatter and he is ok with the idea, says it will save on the white paint and will expect it to be adopted next time.


Have to say I just think FIFA are very poor in adopting new ideas and the rules of the game are

long outdated.


If a rugby man was in charge at FIFA the rules would develop and improve year on year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He wasn't great when interviewed on Channel 4 News this evening either, but he may get some respite tomorrow with the breaking Nandy story.
    • I was referring more to his performance at PMQs yesterday. It was quite a riot! Almost topped Mastermind  
    • Agreed, he should not be held accountable over the mess up over release of prisoners. On the other hand he did himself no favours with his gaffes on the BBC Master Mind programme where he passed on five questions. Where he did answer, here are some of his responses.... When asked who succeeded Henry VIII, Lammy incorrectly answered “Henry VII,” When asked which French scientist won Nobel prizes for both physics and chemistry?” Lammy responded with “Antoinette” When asked which fortress was built to defend Paris and later used as a prison, he answered “Versailles". When asked which variety of blue English cheese is often taken with port, he answered "Leicester" If nothing else he was entertaining.
    • Why do you think he should be toast? All these problems with the prison service apparently go way back, long before Labour took over.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...