Jump to content

Recommended Posts

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We are frequently told not to use phones in the

> street to avoid having them stolen.



But TFL is removing bus times as we can use our phones


Anyway no one will try it with me - too loud and grumpy :)


Edit: meaning I've never even had anyone try and I'm always out maybe my (mis)demeanour

so I've made my own risk assessment

The scenarios below do show a lack of joined up thinking. On the one hand we are advised we should not use technology in the street because it is a thief magnet, but transport companies are making it necessary by using phone apps for tiemtables. Another example is parking, where old coin operated boxes are replaced by phone-in with payment by credit card.


JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> singalto Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > We are frequently told not to use phones in the

> > street to avoid having them stolen.

>

>

> But TFL is removing bus times as we can use our

> phones

>

> Anyway no one will try it with me - too loud and

> grumpy :)

>

> Edit: meaning I've never even had anyone try and

> I'm always out maybe my (mis)demeanour

> so I've made my own risk assessment

I know it's inconsistent, but we just have to make a decision I suppose.


I have headphones on half the time so it's pretty obvious where the phone is,

it's pointless having technology if you're afraid to use it because of some

scumbags.


Hope someone steals their mopeds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Apparently a tourist tax was Raynor's idea, but Reeves has put the kibosh on it because of the push-back she'll get from businesses
    • But a larger number, in a more hotly contested election, didn't. It is an anomaly that Starmer won a landslide in seats with a turnout for Labour which would have shamed Labour leaders in all the 21st and much of the post war 20th century.
    • I was not suggesting anything else!   I'm not sure how you interpret what I said  as "irrelevant"? I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable". My point was that a  large number  of the electorate  voted for him!
    • that's exactly what happened - Brickhouse were forced to close due to rent hike and then Gail's didn't move in until covid restrictions lifted and normality resumed. Gail's would have opened much sooner as they were lined up and able to offer the landlord much higher rents. Brickhouse was a local favourite
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...