Jump to content

Recommended Posts

breaks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has anyone had one and can Euro parks enforce it


Had a few mates get caught out (we used to live opposite and at one time anyone could park there, got caught by the change), unless anyone knows a clever loophole fairly sure you'd have to pay, they have in and out cameras and pretty prominent signage. If you were caught out because you were in the pub might be worth writing to Wetherspoon's and asking for mercy, I always thought it was pretty damned silly having a three hour restriction when a summer family Sunday lunch could easily take longer, to their advantage.

It can be enforced - the owner of private land can levy parking charges and claim penalties if they're not paid. The only way one can escape them is if it's unfair - inadequate signage, wrong timing etc. As mentioned above, the Fox has in and out APNR cameras and pretty clear signs. You could just refuse to pay and see if they can be bothered taking you to court, but that could prove hellishly expensive if they do take you on. Unless you have a just reason for thinking the ticket unfair it might be best just to pay up.


I don't like the way all this operates - it's basically set up to catch the unwary or those making a genuine mistake - and I'm not defending it, but I do suspect appealing it will not get you very far, unless you have a genuine reason to believe it unfair.


ETA Blah's right by the way, it's not a parking fine, it's an invoice for breach of contract, the assumed contract being made when you entered the carpark. However, again unless you have a genuine demonstrable reason it's unfair or excessive you'd still be liable to pay in a civil court.

Ta for your feedback. I was going to give a false name and address for the driver but I've chickened out and reluctantly coughed up. I understand that it stops people parking for the hospital which should be free but Mr Weatherspoon shouldn't endorse parking charges by private companies for people using his pubs. Ho hum another Great British Ripoff!
"Well you see the thing is, I distinctly asked your fine bar staff for non-alcoholic lager. The drinks they served were delicious and by the time I realised I had been drinking reassuringly expensive, full strength Stella Artois, it was all too late and I was very nearly divorced. Leaving the motor in your care was the only responsible thing to do really. Disgraceful service when you think about it though I suppose - how about some Steak Club vouchers eh?" ;-)

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Well you see the thing is, I distinctly asked

> your fine bar staff for non-alcoholic lager. The

> drinks they served were delicious and by the time

> I realised I had been drinking reassuringly

> expensive, full strength Stella Artois, it was all

> too late and I was very nearly divorced. Leaving

> the motor in your care was the only responsible

> thing to do really. Disgraceful service when you

> think about it though I suppose - how about some

> Steak Club vouchers eh?" ;-)


Ha! It's quite symptomatic of the way things are now - when we bought a flat opposite eleven years back if mates were coming to stay I would have a word with the manager, explaining that they were driving and going to have a drink in the pub, would it be OK for them to leave the car overnight - no problem. Now the ANPR system presumably just sends the info to a computer at the parking company which then automatically issues a demand, I don't suppose the manager could override it if s/he wanted to. Progress! Fools to themselves really, as by allowing a little leeway they not only got self and mates running up a fair old bar bill but going back the next morning for coffee and fryups before collecting the car...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gold men’s wedding band and signet ring suspected to have come off outside of William Rose, Moxons or Bora on Lordship Lane on Friday 9th January during the day. Please get in touch if found. Reward if returned!
    • Hello,  I am interested to know people's opinion regarding dogs left tied up outside shops.  As I am hoping most dog owners are aware of how high risk it is now for dog theft.  People's houses are targeted for dog theft, even waiting to have a dog out in their back gardens, even for few minutes, to steal.  This is a very common occurrence now, as is breaking into properties to steal dogs.  The reasons behind dog theft varies, from using to breed, sell on, to use to sit whilst asking for money, (obviously not all people asking for money are dog thieves & may well own their own dog) and for dog bait for fighting.  This is not me being a drama queen, it is there for anyone to research regarding dog theft.  So would you leave your dog tied up outside a shop? 
    • I don't know if any of the cricket or tennis clubs also have little gyms. There are also pilates studios on Melbourne Grove, Blackwater St, North Cross Rd and even the community hall of the church on Calton Ave. The David Lloyd gym in Orpington is very luxurious and expensive.  
    • HI CPR Dave, I have to agree with Dogkennelhillbilly. We still have net migration into the country as per the Office of National Statistics- https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration It may go negative in a year or two if pundits specialising in this are correct, but it isn't yet. Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, I don't think your maths is correct. Southwark Council states total empty homes at 8,588 -https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/housing/southwark-has-over-8500-empty-homes/ the total number of homes is 135k. Which means 6.36% are empty. However, while canvassing came across an empty home which does not appear to have been appreciated by Southwark Council who are now investigating whether the empty Home Council Tax Premium should have been applied for the last 10+ years. It seems likely the 8,588 is under reporting the number of empty homes.  Infill sites are defined by most public bodies was non strategic sites from a development perspective. The railway yard and other sites are in the Southwark strategic plans and thus would not be infill sites.  Tall buildings planted into lower surrounding suburban areas is a subjective matter whether they are viewed as out of character for the area. It is factually true that I think they are out of character. Equally you have no qualms about such tall buildings being planted into the SE22 area. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...