Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is indeed a new camera, a small, silver device on a lamppost on the Sainsbury's 'up' side of the hill, about 60m from the lights at the top.


It's clearly designed to catch motorists cutting the top section of the bus lane in order to turn left.


Probably best to stay to the right, especially motorbikes.


HOWEVER: if you do get a ticket, remember that the camera operator should observe the offence for at least 20 metres, or five car lengths, for it to be valid.

Thanks for the info - worth remembering though that the 20M "rule" is only a guideline and doesn't automatically guarantee that the charge will be rescinded - otherwise everyone could use the last 19M of the bus lane with impunity! If a car dives in for just five metres and impedes a bus, for example, it's very unlikely that the ticket would be waived on the grounds of distance. Oh and make sure if you're forced to use the bus lane that you make a note of date and time: when I was working for a while as a motorcycle courier I was caught by a bus mounted camera on City Road - I was pretty sure that I would only have gone into the bus lane to avoid an accident or to let an emergency vehicle through, but as I was up and down that road dozens of times a week I couldn't provide evidence of that and so just had to pay up.

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There isn't a camera there, as far as I can see

> (and this is where the problem is!)


Bus Lane Cameras are NOT big Yellow boxes. They can be very small and inconspicuous..



http://www.expressandstar.com/wpmvc/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/walsall-bus-lane-camrea.jpg


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> kford Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There isn't a camera there, as far as I can see

> > (and this is where the problem is!)

>

> Bus Lane Cameras are NOT big Yellow boxes. They

> can be very small and inconspicuous..

>

>

> http://www.expressandstar.com/wpmvc/wp/wp-content/

> uploads/2015/10/walsall-bus-lane-camrea.jpg

>

> DulwichFox



I meant, the lower part of the bus lane is where the problem is, where most cars cut in to turn left into Sainsbury's (and where two-wheelers are most likely to be cut up).


I know bus lane cameras are usually small CCTV units on posts, often doubling up as traffic monitoring cameras. There was one outside Denmark Hill station, but it's been taken down.

  • 4 weeks later...

natty01295 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PHOTO - That's not dog kennel hill


The poster didn't mean it was GKH - rather an example of a semi-hidden camera.


Anyway, agree with Passiflora. It's really not hard to do your left at the very top opposite the school.

The threads about this bus lane and the camera have really baffled me. Why should it make a difference as to whether you drive in the bus lane if there is a new camera? If people want to turn into Sainsburys, the road markings make it very clear where the bus lane ends. I don't understand why people complained in the other thread that they had received penalty charge notices for using the bus lane - it has been in place for many years - surely motorists know that they are not allowed to drive in bus lanes during the hours of operation and are liable to a penalty charge if they choose to do so?
I think the problem is that if it is busy and there are buses in the bus lane and you are in the right hand lane (where you should be) wanting to turn left into Sainsbury's, you hold up the traffic behind you as you wait for the buses to go past, with the resulting frustration from those behind as the lights go red again.

I totally agree with Treehugger.


There is also no reason why this has to be a permanent bus lane. Most bus lanes in London operate in peak hours, with the exception of some around really busy junctions. This could easily be a peak time lane and exempt after 7pm for example.




treehugger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the problem is that if it is busy and

> there are buses in the bus lane and you are in the

> right hand lane (where you should be) wanting to

> turn left into Sainsbury's, you hold up the

> traffic behind you as you wait for the buses to go

> past, with the resulting frustration from those

> behind as the lights go red again.

treehugger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the problem is that if it is busy and

> there are buses in the bus lane and you are in the

> right hand lane (where you should be) wanting to

> turn left into Sainsbury's, you hold up the

> traffic behind you as you wait for the buses to go

> past, with the resulting frustration from those

> behind as the lights go red again.


Yep - they'll beep but so be it and I'll ignore :)

Thanks to the lovely person behind me when I was trying to get as quickly as possible into the left lane to turn into Sainsburys, you've got a nice loud Hooter, hope you feel better now! Don't expect people to get a ticket so you can knock 2 minutes off your journey! Rant over!!
  • 3 months later...

Don't know if anyone can advise tonight about the bus lane on the other side of the road, about 50 yards further up the hill?


Was parked in a side road. Turned left into DKH. Didn't immediately get out of the bus lane, albeit no more than a few car lengths, and in the correct Lane well before the lights. There is a camera sign, but does anyone know where the camera is along there?


Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
    • The tissues would absorb secretions from your nose.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...