Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Need some advice re. subsidence


Has anyone in E. Dulwich had experience getting a neighbor to remove a large tree from their garden which has been proved to be the cause of subsidence in other adjacent properties? Does this need to go through the council or should I let my home insurance company's loss prevention firm to address this directly with them? Thanks for any feedback on this topic.


traveler2

It needs to go to the Land Registry to find the owner of the tree.

You will need to get permission to remove the tree.


I went through this proceedure 20 years ago.


The tree was on a shared access which was not part of access to my property.

and did not affect my property, but I still ending up paying for some of the work.


Very complex proceedure.


Wish you luck.

I had exactly this problem in a previous property.


The insurance company's loss prevention guys determined that the tree was causing a problem, and they then contacted the neighbours directly to arrange removal. Contrary to DulwichFox's experience, it was all resolved very easily.

Thanks all for the feedback. I spoke to the council tree specialist today and he said they could not do anything as its a private property. Peckhampam, was your's a council property or private?


I was told I could prune any overhanging branches but as per law would have to offer them to the owner - who can accept or not. If not, I am responsible for disposing of them. Got to love that law.


As to the greater problem, I was advised I would need to address this with the owner of the property who could agree or not to take down the tree. If they don't agree, I would need to look to my insurance company to file a law suit against them which could take years. I am now siding with DulwichFox's experience!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m basing it on the fact that Jeremy Corbyn had repeatedly and on record said he is against mandatory vaccinations in any situation, and he wouldn’t disclose wether he had the Covid vaccine himself    as I said. Not as bad as his brother but very definitely a bit weird about the whole thing. Just say you had the vaccination Jeremy, say that everyone should and stop being weird in the middle of a global pandemic    it’s the same slippery evasive nonsense about Brexit and him. About Putin poisonings and him.     if you are happy with his evasiveness then you do you.  But there is a reason the country wouldn’t get behind him 
    • It was my understanding that Jeremy Corbyn was embarrassed by his brother and had distanced himself from his brother's views. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. Why on earth should "the overall view of that family inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic"? What exactly are you basing that assumption on?
    • I guess it's best to do what most Brits do these days, keep your head down and say nothing! although that's probably why this country is in the mess it is today!  😞
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...