Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Need some advice re. subsidence


Has anyone in E. Dulwich had experience getting a neighbor to remove a large tree from their garden which has been proved to be the cause of subsidence in other adjacent properties? Does this need to go through the council or should I let my home insurance company's loss prevention firm to address this directly with them? Thanks for any feedback on this topic.


traveler2

It needs to go to the Land Registry to find the owner of the tree.

You will need to get permission to remove the tree.


I went through this proceedure 20 years ago.


The tree was on a shared access which was not part of access to my property.

and did not affect my property, but I still ending up paying for some of the work.


Very complex proceedure.


Wish you luck.

I had exactly this problem in a previous property.


The insurance company's loss prevention guys determined that the tree was causing a problem, and they then contacted the neighbours directly to arrange removal. Contrary to DulwichFox's experience, it was all resolved very easily.

Thanks all for the feedback. I spoke to the council tree specialist today and he said they could not do anything as its a private property. Peckhampam, was your's a council property or private?


I was told I could prune any overhanging branches but as per law would have to offer them to the owner - who can accept or not. If not, I am responsible for disposing of them. Got to love that law.


As to the greater problem, I was advised I would need to address this with the owner of the property who could agree or not to take down the tree. If they don't agree, I would need to look to my insurance company to file a law suit against them which could take years. I am now siding with DulwichFox's experience!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...