Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But for the avoidance of doubt there were experts on both sides and so-called experts and 'experts' in abundance too. I thought there were more dodgy 'experts' trotted out on the Remain side (probably because of the vested interests they tend to have) but that is nothing whatsoever to do with whether I favoured Remain or Leave - just my view.


But to suggest (as you seem to) that I've taken a view against certain 'experts' because they were in favour of the Remain camp just underlines the fact that you have not read my post properly - had you done so it would have been pretty clear I voted to remain, otherwise I would not have said "I'm disappointed about the vote result"!

no, it's not.


>I thought there were more dodgy 'experts' trotted out on the Remain side

> (probably because of the vested interests they tend to have)


Define vested interest (V) amounts as follows:


RSCE - remain so-called experts V

LSCE - leave so-called experts V

RE - remain experts V

LE - leave experts V

R - remain opinion holders in general V

L - leave opinion holders in general V


Are you saying:

RSCE > LSCE

RE > LE

R > L


...or something else?

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no, it's not.

>

> >I thought there were more dodgy 'experts' trotted

> out on the Remain side

> > (probably because of the vested interests they

> tend to have)

>

> Define vested interest (V) amounts as follows:

>

> RSCE - remain so-called experts V

> LSCE - leave so-called experts V

> RE - remain experts V

> LE - leave experts V

> R - remain opinion holders in general V

> L - leave opinion holders in general V

>

> Are you saying:

> RSCE > LSCE

> RE > LE

> R > L

>

> ...or something else?


Sorry but that's complete nonsense! Your time would have been better spent reading my clear and simple wording than writing all that guff!


To save you scrolling up - I said "I thought there were more dodgy 'experts' trotted out on the Remain side (probably because of the vested interests they tend to have).


What part of that sentence don't you understand? You ask "who is 'they'?" Seriously?

Many champagne socialists of the Corbynite camp use the Co-op....

I think the Archbishop of Canterbury summed it up when he said the poor suffer under mass immigration.

And the poor may also be poorly educated and unable to hold their own in this debate- which is dominated by the verbosity of the hysterical middle-classes, who, in the main, branded them racist- completely out of hand.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you find that people are generally unpleasant

> towards you?



No. But then I'm pleased to say that in the real world neither do I come across people that deliberately try to pick an argument by setting up false constructs or by asking fatuous questions designed merely to provoke a response or to make a bad point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I remember the Tuesday property supplement that must’ve earned them a few bob - all disappeared when right move et cetera put it all online.  I think Southwark news took the stories ( and the readers) that SLP didn’t touch
    • Shame. I wondered why they were asking for donations to help with running costs in last weeks issue. Been buying it for many years but only recently was thinking of giving it a miss as over the past couple of years it had become too politicised. Their South London Opinion page was particularly biased. 
    • Clear now at 4.20pm
    • I saw that a couple of hours ago - should’ve been sorted by now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...