Jump to content

Mind Charity Shop, East Dulwich


Libbyloo

Recommended Posts

I regularly donate to charity and always try to donate to mental health charities as much as possible, however I have never encountered such rude staff as the staff at East Dulwich Mind charity shop. I don't appear to be the only person that has encountered the hostile reception from the staff there as many of my friends in the area have started donating elsewhere for that reason. It seems such a shame that the charity should suffer because of this but I must admit, I now feel the same and will start donating to alternative charity shops in the area.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/128346-mind-charity-shop-east-dulwich/
Share on other sites

I actually have experienced nothing but friendly lovely service in that shop.

Usually by a guy with lots of silver rings.

I have both brought and donated and find it much more fairly priced than the 'Marys' shop.

I hate the idea of people chosing not to donate to a charity because they have beef with the volunteers.

Its unproductive and selfish to do so.

I've found plenty of surly rubbish staff in charity shops (For instance a lady in the local Oxfam where I used to live who used to treat everyone like a potential shoplifter) But if I believe in the cause I still give.

Most are volenteers and as stated by myself earlier-because you may have had a negative experience with a staff member there are others such as myself who haven't (actually as well as the guy with the rings theres also a middle aged lady who has always been friendly and charming to me.)

I feel naming and shaming a local CHARITY shop on a public forum is pretty damn shameful tbh.

Online 'forum'... the clue is in the title. The response to this and the daily mail report has only confirmed to me that there is no excuse at all for such rudeness. The charity won't suffer as I will still donate to Mind, but not to that particular shop.

Libbyloo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Online 'forum'... the clue is in the title. The

> response to this and the daily mail report has

> only confirmed to me that there is no excuse at

> all for such rudeness. The charity won't suffer as

> I will still donate to Mind, but not to that

> particular shop.

'

The other clue in the title is East Dulwich - as you live in Crystal Palace,

perhaps you could donate locally, n'est-ce pas?

And six or ten years ago, it is relevant now because ....?


Mind is a mental health charity.


If you don't want to donate items to Mind then fair enough - there are lots of other worthy charities, many of which have shops - but it seems a bit sad (in the unhappy sense of sad) not to do so because some of the staff/volunteers there don't meet your expectations of how they should behave.


As said above, some of them are likely to have, or to have had in the past, or to be recovering from, mental health issues.


Were they actually "hostile " as the OP says, and if so in what way?


Or did they just not welcome the donations with over-effusive thanks in gratitude for your wonderful kindness in choosing to give them to their shop?


I usually take my unwanted items to the Hospice shop, but I leave them by the door to the inner sanctum, tell a volunteer I've left them there, and leave. I don't expect a blooming great burst of gratitude in return.


ETA: And in the case of some kinds of donations, they are overrun with them. I imagine their heart sinks on seeing more books or CDs, for example.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...