Jump to content

Recommended Posts

London Borough of Southwark has now responded to those of us who wish to see more trees in the cemeteries. The council has put forward 4 options for the Old Nursery site behind Honor Oak Station: 2 options are for traditional burials, one for meadow burials, and the last, option 4, is for woodland burials. Option 4 will involve the planting of a tree for every person buried there, and Southwark has acknowledged that, once the trees are established, it will be difficult to re-use the area after 75 years.

If we do not vote for option 4 the council could choose one of the other, less environmentally-friendly, options to the detriment of the ecology and wildlife of the area. Although it would be lovely to have the cemetery declared a nature reserve, realistically, Southwark will not agree to this. Therefore, I believe that Option 4 is a reasonable compromise between people who would like to have their relatives buried in Southwark and those who wish to have trees in the cemeteries.

You can look at the plans for the Old Nursery site at http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200032/deaths_funerals_and_cremations/2231/the_future_of_southwarks_cemeteries/4. Responses to Southwark's plans need to be made by 31 October.

Many thanks!

If we do not vote for option 4 the council could choose one of the other, less environmentally-friendly, options to the detriment of the ecology and wildlife of the area.


There is no evidence that a wood is more environmentally-friendly than a meadow. Nor that re-use of burial land is not environmentally friendly in its own right. Indeed, if the wrong (non-native) trees are brought in a wood may be far more unfriendly to native species than a meadow. I am not sure anyway that those who opt for 'woodland burials' think of them as being 'done' in an inner London borough.

This is the link to the various options https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/++preview++/environment-leisure/camberwell-new-cemetery-consultation/supporting_documents/Area%20B%20options%20pros%20and%20cons%20summary%20October%202016.pdf


The Woodland option has the lowest overall cost, but the highest cost per burial. The 'cons' are listed as follows:-


Provides only 1050 burial plots/internment spaces

Highest cost per burial

Absence of traditional memorials could make it difficult to sell plots

Those who want to visit the grave may be unable to identify the exact plot

Trees substantially limit the ability to re-use graves

Longest time to reach maturity

Revenue costs (management of woodland) greater than options 2 & 3


The pros are:-


Lowest total cost

Trees planted across the site

Pond feature added

Pedestrian and cycle pathways added from Honor Oak

Responds well to consultation by creating a fully wooded area, without traditional memorials


The pond and pathways are also pros for the meadow scheme.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Who was Diana Rayworth, when 'resting from acting'. Her successful career was very sadly cut short following a devastating accident. 
    • thanks Jenijenjen and all - yes, i remember walking or taking the bus from the elephant (where i was working) to Camberwell to get there.  I think Tim - who's still at Franklin's -  was there in those days, and the woman who ran the cafe!  Other food places that i remember fondly are the ones in Neal's Yard (with the Hunkin sculpture that you could put a coin in ) and the basement lunch place at the Tottenham Court Road junction with Hanway Street... 
    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertised  times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...