Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, Sue, as I said "IT'S A SHOP".

> My book didn't count in their scheme because it

> was a hardback, and so, obviously, not a book.

> Perhaps this makes it a small coffee table or door

> step.



One of my other two books was a hardback, and they seemed to think that was included in the sale.


I now have an urge to make it into a (very very) small coffee table :))

A glass made out of glass is a glass..


An ashtray made out of glass is an ashtray not a glass.

So when does an ashtray become a glass..


Take a table and cut an inch off each leg.. it is still a table..

Cut off another 2 inches .. it is still a table..

Keep going.. When does a table become a tray. ?




DulwichFox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A glass made out of glass is a glass..

>

> An ashtray made out of glass is an ashtray not a

> glass.

> So when does an ashtray become a glass..

>

> Take a table and cut an inch off each leg.. it is

> still a table..

> Cut off another 2 inches .. it is still a table..

>

> Keep going.. When does a table become a tray. ?

>


It's all about function, Fox .....

No it cannot be about function. That would mean it had an essence as being-for something in advance of the practice in which it was recognisable.


There are no glasses, tables or ashtrays: we reify constellations of signifiers as things (here, as prototypes) and then tell children they are beings - 'get your elbows off my table or I will hit you' (I remember).

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As opposed to your vital thread on whether or not

> you should wear a tie, Seabag? What's sauce for

> the goose...bit of live and let live, maybe?



Ties are absolutely vital RH, get a grip


Imagine a world without them


Bloody hell, whatever next

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > As opposed to your vital thread on whether or

> not

> > you should wear a tie, Seabag? What's sauce

> for

> > the goose...bit of live and let live, maybe?

>

>

> Ties are absolutely vital RH, get a grip

>

> Imagine a world without them

>

> Bloody hell, whatever next


True, sorry - hadn't thought it through.

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No it cannot be about function. That would mean it

> had an essence as being-for something in advance

> of the practice in which it was recognisable.

>

There are no glasses, tables or ashtrays: we reify

> constellations of signifiers as things (here, as

> prototypes) and then tell children they are beings

> - 'get your elbows off my table or I will hit you'

> (I remember).


That is True and there are no books.


http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-there-are-no-solids-there-are-no-things-there-are-only-interfering-and-non-interfering-r-buckminster-fuller-103-97-36.jpg


Who is going to argue with Fuller.


DulwichFox

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Andonwegowithsuesendlesstrialandpedantictribulatio

> nsbubbleandsqueekoorlaintandfolkmusicitalljustmelt

> sintoonedrippingmetathreadofsueness



If you don't like my posts don't read them!


At least I have never made a personal attack on another poster, so far as I know.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> Andonwegowithsuesendlesstrialandpedantictribulatio

>

> >

> nsbubbleandsqueekoorlaintandfolkmusicitalljustmelt

>

> > sintoonedrippingmetathreadofsueness

>

>

> If you don't like my posts don't read them!

>

> At least I have never made a personal attack on

> another poster, so far as I know.


Hands up, I did call RH a TIT


Tho even he will concede, he was being a bit of one

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's not posh Foxy, just perceived trendiness. It

> will be something else 6 months on...


OK. Not Posh.. but Trendy.. Beards and Sandals ? Think it may be around for a while though. ?

I'm a bit old for that sort of thing.. I suppose they may hide me in a corner if they arn't too busy and I were to pop in.

:)

Foxy

Many people 'volunteering' in charity shops are doing 'Community Service' following a court appearance - some who have poor 'customer service skills'. Although this does not make up for the rudeness to others. I would have just confessed my mistake and saying I was having a senior moment if I was serving and apologise.


Hubby volunteers in a charity shop and is incensed when people try to haggle with him wanting a ?2 item of clothing for 10p - tells them all the money goes to the charity and if they wanted something that cheap he suggests that they look around for jumble sales. At the same time he laughs at the things people donate - out of date packets of food, worn pants and bras, dirty kitchen utensils, packets of tampex (unopened)

Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Hubby volunteers in a charity shop and is incensed

> when people try to haggle with him wanting a ?2

> item of clothing for 10p - tells them all the

> money goes to the charity and if they wanted

> something that cheap he suggests that they look

> around for jumble sales. At the same time he

> laughs at the things people donate - out of date

> packets of food, worn pants and bras, dirty

> kitchen utensils, packets of tampex (unopened)



Well it would be worrying if the packets of Tampax contained used items ...... !


If I'm not sure if a charity shop will accept items, I ask. I once took in some unopened cleaning products (I think it was) as part of a load of items following a clearout of a relative's flat when she died.


They said they couldn't sell them in the shop but that some of the volunteers might be glad of them.


I guess it would be the same with the (unopened!) packets of Tampax?


Better somebody can make use of something than it goes to landfill, surely?


Donating dirty items, that's a different matter, bleurgh.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > When is a jam jar a beer glass?

>

> In 2012 I think

>

> MeatLiquor or that Diner thing they did way back

> in the day had them, there after it's just wankery

> and need knocking on the head.



Only place I've had it (being as I don't visit anywhere remotely trendy) was The Communion Bar in Camberwell, when I went to see a friend play some music. Nice bar, I liked the surroundings, but the offerings from the bar were a load of wank served in bottles, or dirty looking jars if you asked for a glass.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > When is a jam jar a beer glass?

> >

> > In 2012 I think

> >

> > MeatLiquor or that Diner thing they did way

> back

> > in the day had them, there after it's just

> wankery

> > and need knocking on the head.

>

>

> Only place I've had it (being as I don't visit

> anywhere remotely trendy) was The Communion Bar in

> Camberwell, when I went to see a friend play some

> music. Nice bar, I liked the surroundings, but the

> offerings from the bar were a load of @#$%& served

> in bottles, or dirty looking jars if you asked for

> a glass.



Jam jars are nice to put flowers in, but why you would want to drink from one, God knows.


What really amuses me is that now, in places like Wilko, you can get glasses made to look like jam jars, complete with metal lids and holes punched in the lids for a straw :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...