Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shaggy> One interesting point, though, is that if it does turn out that Article 50 is

Shaggy> reveresable, then the courts will quash Thursday's ruling.


Or if in doubt, refer it to the CJEU, as has at least been mooted by some, even before the referendum; see eg http://www.howtocrackanut.com/blog/2016/11/3/why-an-appeal-of-the-high-court-parliamentary-brexit and https://eutopialaw.com/2016/07/08/what-next-an-analysis-of-the-eu-law-questions-surrounding-article-50-teu-part-one/. I suspect rather an outside chance, but it does promise possible further dark comedic potential, for them as can take any more, that is.

I still think it's common sense that A50 is reversible. Why is it not - nothing has changed after invoking it.


The article below states TM should be clear before invoking it that she knows if it's reversible - and it benefits her negotiations if it is. We could withdraw, wait a bit then invoke it again for instance.


http://uk.businessinsider.com/brexit-article-50-may-not-be-reversible-2016-10


and the blog (repeating what has been said here)but concluding it'll have to go to Europe to decide.


https://waitingfortax.com/2016/10/16/brexit-the-important-role-of-the-court-of-justice/



Worth noting if (when our millennial generation) grow up - they decide to go back into the EU it would be without any budget rebate and within the common currency in all probability.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pure speculation, but what do people think will

> happen?


All hinges on the Supreme Court decision.

If they overturn last week's decision, then it's full steam ahead with Brexit, and probably a hard one with the hawks in the Cabinet pulling May's strings.

If they side with last week's judgement, then as has already been said it's a mess with a myriad of possible outcomes.

Maybe there will (should) be a good old fashioned political compromise. The MPs agree to vote for Article 50 to be triggered, but with the caveat that the terms of Brexit that the Gov has negotiated are then voted on by a second Referendum.

That way there are no accusations that Brexit has been blocked, and the Gov gets to negotiate how it sees fit, keeping it's bargaining chips close to it's chest. The public will then be voting from a much more informed standpoint as to what Brexit actually will mean politically and economically for the country...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Pure speculation, but what do people think will

> > happen?

>

> All hinges on the Supreme Court decision.

> If they overturn last week's decision, then it's

> full steam ahead with Brexit, and probably a hard

> one with the hawks in the Cabinet pulling May's

> strings.

> If they side with last week's judgement, then as

> has already been said it's a mess with a myriad of

> possible outcomes.

> Maybe there will (should) be a good old fashioned

> political compromise. The MPs agree to vote for

> Article 50 to be triggered, but with the caveat

> that the terms of Brexit that the Gov has

> negotiated are then voted on by a second

> Referendum.

> That way there are no accusations that Brexit has

> been blocked, and the Gov gets to negotiate how it

> sees fit, keeping it's bargaining chips close to

> it's chest. The public will then be voting from a

> much more informed standpoint as to what Brexit

> actually will mean politically and economically

> for the country...


If Article 50 is irreversible a second referendum would be

(A) accept the terms agreed

(B) Exit with no terms

We're effectively out as soon as we invoke it ??


Yet if it's reversible the appeal should be allowed.

but parliament might get a choice of

(A) Accept the terms agreed

(B) Exit with no terms

© Return to the EU (and maybe invoke A50 again - been suggested)

Good thread. I liked rahrahrah's response to the first Q about why so personal - being about one's sense of identity and place in the world.


Two other Qs strike me i) on reversibility/Art.50 - what does the politial window for reversibility look like wrt how this is seen in Europe? Is there a legal point-of-no-return after which you can't trigger the 'reverse' during the negotiating process and would the default simply be back to BAU (as now)? Even if legally possible, what about the politics - would the dumped 27 want a full marriage again? How much political capital would have been lost through a heavy-handed negotiation strategy? What are the consequences for Britain's role in the EU? National elections in other EU countries next year surely make the landscape even more uncertain. Attitudes can harden quickly.


ii) Don't forget the other front - TM has to manage the relationship w other 3 nations of UK - including with the passage of any 'EU Repeal Act'. Another heavy handed bad start - fobbing them off with a hotline to D-Davis.


In addition to the absent debate over which Brexit option, I don't have any confidence at all that they know how to run a complex negotiation beyond chest-beating to the media.

>This is sobering. Attachments: Enemies.jpg (40.4KB)


I don't know where you got it from, but the English caption is incorrect. Here's a clearer and fuller version of the original: http://www.hans-dieter-arntz.de/bilder/volksverraeter.png


The headline actually says: "Betrayers of the People Expelled From The German Community." The text declares that the following persons, located abroad (they had already fled the country), have been deprived of German citizenship, having acted in breach of their duty of loyalty to the reich and the people.


Of those in the first row that I can find mention of (all politicians), Scheidemann, Wels and Breitscheid were leading members of the SDP, Pieck a communist. None a lawyer.


Scheidemann https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philipp_Scheidemann

Wels https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Wels

Pieck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Pieck

Breitscheid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Breitscheid

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

yes, he is "just stepping aside" so that someone with 10 years of negotiating umph can take over now (at the beginning of "the process").


wonders of having people of the calibre of John Redwood and Nigel Farage dismiss this as an administrative efficiency :-(

This is farcical https://www.ft.com/content/4735fad6-d1c0-11e6-b06b-680c49b4b4c0

We're tired of experts and complexity. We want someone red white and blue, who understands that Brexit means Brexit blah, blah, blah. I always assumed that May's inane rhetoric was based on a total disdain for the intelligence of the general public, that she was just hugely condescending. But now I'm starting to think she may not very bright and that this explains the simplicity of her rhetoric.

The Ambassador is right with his 10 year line IMHO - that Sky News are vilifying him for. The 2 year negotiations are just about process and residents in UK and EU - Nobody seems to have realised this - why would the EU discuss trade deals in the two year talks about process (We can walk out early - very hard Brexit with no process).


Trade negotiations start after the 2 year process and Canada-EU talks took 7 years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...