Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Brexiteers seem not to have realised the two year negotiations are about

the divorce practicalities not about life after the divorce. Trade negotiations

will not be discussed for instance.


http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21711886-still-its-sexiest-job-brussels-eus-brexit-negotiators-prepare-disaster


If the team is filled with Brexiteers they will probably walk away.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course he's right. He's been hounded out of his

> post be ideologues, who don't want to be

> challenged by inconvenient realities. It's an

> absolute shambles.


He's had his snout in the trough gorging himself at EU taxpayers' expense for too long and gone native. Made a pig's ear of Cameron's pre-Brexit 'fundamental reforms'. Good riddance. Let's get people in with some cojones.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's had his snout in the trough gorging himself

> at EU taxpayers' expense for too long and gone

> native. Made a pig's ear of Cameron's pre-Brexit

> 'fundamental reforms'. Good riddance. Let's get

> people in with some conjones.


They'll just point at the rule book (which is on the EU's side) and

our big cajoned guys will take the nuclear option.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-weighs-the-cost-of-the-brexit-nuclear-option-1482089742


Of course there would be a lot of jobs required in the civil service

but how are we going to get people with the skills and who pays ?

He's a good bloke (Ivan Rogers) and all the coverage shows what a nasty piece of poo Farage is (an the ever more popular Redwood).


Perhaps those voting leave can pay for all the extra resources needed to sort out this mess.


Yes it is still personal.


Here's some more stuff. Not vouching for the content.


http://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/ripples-around-the-world-brexits-implications-for-europe-and-beyond/

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yup - perhaps the most significant reason behind

> Brexit is the failure of Cameron's pre-referendum

> negotiations with the EU led by? erm, let me think


Sky interviewed a Welsh diplomat this morning and he said the

Ambassador portrays the government policies to EU and takes back

to the Government the EU's views.


Cameron was responsible for Cameron's negotiation stance (which

is what I think you mean :) )

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yup - perhaps the most significant reason

> behind

> > Brexit is the failure of Cameron's

> pre-referendum

> > negotiations with the EU led by? erm, let me

> think

>

> Sky interviewed a Welsh diplomat this morning and

> he said the

> Ambassador portrays the government policies to EU

> and takes back

> to the Government the EU's views.

>

> Cameron was responsible for Cameron's negotiation

> stance (which

> is what I think you mean :) )


Well if that's the case - he's a go-between- why is it such a loss that he's gone according to so many?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Well if that's the case - he's a go-between- why

> is it such a loss that he's gone according to so

> many?


This was the guy


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emyr_Jones_Parry


He did make it all seem rather simple (being a diplomat).


Swansea City fan too.

  • 2 weeks later...
Thought this was a measured and well written 'piece' on the response to May's speech and specifically her declaration that we will be leaving the single market http://stephentall.org/2017/01/18/what-vote-leave-said-about-uk-membership-of-the-single-market/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you want to change a radiator and it is the same size, pretty straight forward.  isolate by turning the two valves, one is straight forward hand twist, the other side you need to take the cap off and get an adjustable spanner and turn till closed.  Both clockwise. Use the same spanner to undo the large nuts that fix the radiator to the pipework, open the bleed valve, get a flatish container to catch the water which is likely to be a grotty black, sheets/plastic underneath to protect floor/floor covering.  Then jiggle off, tipping as quick as you an into your water container. Fingers crossed it will be the same back plate fitting.  If not you will have to take the old one off and fix the new one. Replacement is a reverse, allowing the rad to refill and let the air out. No naked flames involved. If it is a different size I can advise on that too. Lots on line too: https://www.toolstation.com/help-and-advice/how-to-guides/how-to-remove-radiator?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=19747119835&gclid=CjwKCAiAkvDMBhBMEiwAnUA9BR26YwBA6kOfcR4-JVxfJEjWdhRk6j0imCNcsIfu064wHN54-cs10xoCZ4cQAvD_BwE Although this is for a pressurised (combi) system where you need to get it back to pressure.  Pretty simple.  I don't bother with jointing compound.    
    • Fair enough - I'm absolutely wrong on that one. 👍
    • I'm still completely unclear what happened, apart from that a car apparently crashed into a lamp post opposite the Co-op. I presume the one in Lordship Lane, though the OP doesn't say. Was it speeding? Did it swerve to avoid someone who ran into the road? Did something go wrong with its brakes or steering? Did the driver have a medical emergency or fall asleep or got  distracted by something? Was there something slippery on the road surface? Was the driver hurt? Were any passengers hurt? Were any pedestrians or other road users hurt? Were there any witnesses? 
    • confused by the question?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...