Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Brexiteers seem not to have realised the two year negotiations are about

the divorce practicalities not about life after the divorce. Trade negotiations

will not be discussed for instance.


http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21711886-still-its-sexiest-job-brussels-eus-brexit-negotiators-prepare-disaster


If the team is filled with Brexiteers they will probably walk away.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course he's right. He's been hounded out of his

> post be ideologues, who don't want to be

> challenged by inconvenient realities. It's an

> absolute shambles.


He's had his snout in the trough gorging himself at EU taxpayers' expense for too long and gone native. Made a pig's ear of Cameron's pre-Brexit 'fundamental reforms'. Good riddance. Let's get people in with some cojones.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's had his snout in the trough gorging himself

> at EU taxpayers' expense for too long and gone

> native. Made a pig's ear of Cameron's pre-Brexit

> 'fundamental reforms'. Good riddance. Let's get

> people in with some conjones.


They'll just point at the rule book (which is on the EU's side) and

our big cajoned guys will take the nuclear option.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-weighs-the-cost-of-the-brexit-nuclear-option-1482089742


Of course there would be a lot of jobs required in the civil service

but how are we going to get people with the skills and who pays ?

He's a good bloke (Ivan Rogers) and all the coverage shows what a nasty piece of poo Farage is (an the ever more popular Redwood).


Perhaps those voting leave can pay for all the extra resources needed to sort out this mess.


Yes it is still personal.


Here's some more stuff. Not vouching for the content.


http://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/ripples-around-the-world-brexits-implications-for-europe-and-beyond/

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yup - perhaps the most significant reason behind

> Brexit is the failure of Cameron's pre-referendum

> negotiations with the EU led by? erm, let me think


Sky interviewed a Welsh diplomat this morning and he said the

Ambassador portrays the government policies to EU and takes back

to the Government the EU's views.


Cameron was responsible for Cameron's negotiation stance (which

is what I think you mean :) )

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yup - perhaps the most significant reason

> behind

> > Brexit is the failure of Cameron's

> pre-referendum

> > negotiations with the EU led by? erm, let me

> think

>

> Sky interviewed a Welsh diplomat this morning and

> he said the

> Ambassador portrays the government policies to EU

> and takes back

> to the Government the EU's views.

>

> Cameron was responsible for Cameron's negotiation

> stance (which

> is what I think you mean :) )


Well if that's the case - he's a go-between- why is it such a loss that he's gone according to so many?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Well if that's the case - he's a go-between- why

> is it such a loss that he's gone according to so

> many?


This was the guy


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emyr_Jones_Parry


He did make it all seem rather simple (being a diplomat).


Swansea City fan too.

  • 2 weeks later...
Thought this was a measured and well written 'piece' on the response to May's speech and specifically her declaration that we will be leaving the single market http://stephentall.org/2017/01/18/what-vote-leave-said-about-uk-membership-of-the-single-market/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think i ever wore a badge / not because I didn’t want people to know who I was (I think most people knew) but I hate badges and wearing them  find badges a bit cringe tbh  just ask someone there name - you’re already out socialising and drinking      There wasn’t a lot to it.  Pick a pub that’s likely to have space on the evening - ask the pub can we reserve the tables. Post date and time in here  it did grow to some quite big evenings.  But those early meet-ups were only 5 or 6 people. It grew from there  if it’s a date I can be in London I might try and get along 
    • He’s always playing a gig somewhere here and I thought I had read he lived here - I could be wrong on latter point tho 
    • There were a number of pubs called "x and firkin".  I recall "font and firkin" in brighton. I think the original was in Lewisham.    I reemember from around 1984. At some point they got taken over by M&B and went through a number of name changes. It was a bit out of area for forum drinks.....  My recollection is most people wore name badges with either their forum name or real name. Some people didnt want to reveal their forum id. I have some floppy disk labels I can donate to the cause!  
    • How come? Has he moved down there? I thought he lived in London?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...