Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear parent/carer,


It is with regret, that we are unable to open the school to children on Thursday 2nd and Friday 3rd September because our Fire Alarm system has been affected by water, leaving the school in breach of Health and Safety regulations. We will keep you informed of developments as they become clear to us. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.


Please would you forward this email to any Goodrich parents/carers, as we don't have updated emails for everyone on roll. Please note that 2 text messages were sent; first text on the 31/08/10 and the second on the 01/09/10, but Wauton Samuel's (our service provider) network was down and some parents did not receive those messages.


Once again sorry for any inconvenience



Goodrich Community Primary School

I would be interested to hear more about this, if possible. Closing the school for at least two days has such a huge impact on parents and carers. I do hope it was done because there was absolutely no alternative whatsoever.

Well, I did not receive any texts and neither did anyone else I know... Also the school looks like a building site and that is the real reason. Nothing to do with the fire alarm. Interesting to see what Southwark council say.


Also, I now have to pay another ?100 childcare costs.


Typical Goodrich..............

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...