Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most of the 15,000 Tartan Army avoiding Trafalgar Square today (traditional meeting grounds) to respect the Rememberance activities. Instead you're all advised to avoid Covent Garden - where I'm headed now....

Saw a few at Buckingham Palace this morning at 8.20. They can't have been drinking too hard last night.


They probably heard the sun was coming out and know they wont see it again until April.


Scotland 9/1 for tonight's game. Tough one.

DovertheRoad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yep. Could be a rout MM if England not playing so

> badly. Anything but a win for England would be a

> shock.


Broonie could take Hendersen in midfield on a one to one but England's strength in midfield generally will probably mean he has his work cut out.


My wife and kids are out tonight so ill watch it as long as it remains close for you.

England 2 Scotland 3


The world cup winners unbeaten run at Wembley didn't last long - and watch out in the commentary for a Jack Charlton effort that "he thought was over the line".... we heard that before.




And it seems Scotland beat England that day with only two from Celtic's team that won the 1967 European Cup, all of whom were Scots. The Scotland selectors must have had an embarrassment of riches!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would prefer “intolerant of nonsense,  outspoken and direct” and I definitely try to avoid “bullying”  Am I above personal insults and name-calling? Hmmm. On balance I think I receive more than I give 
    • But I have never, once mentioned the storming of the capital, or said Trump is in any way not morally reprehensible. You put all those words into my mouth. For me, this isn't about Trump - they could have made that edit about Gaddafi, or Hussein, or Johnson... it doesn't matter. What matters is that the producers' unconscious bias affected their editorial decision-making.. That is the only point I have ever made on this thread. It was you who decided that I'm a raving Trump supporter. 
    • Don't be ridiculous, he's not a troll!   But he is proving himself to be a bully, who's incapable of debating without resorting to angry outbursts, personal insults and name-calling. 
    • I still say “morally reprehensible” is too extreme  unless you are talking about Trump. And what he did that day. And what the outcome was. And him pardoning the criminals  that is clearly morally reprehensible and in no way comparable to the bbc edit   Ow if you want to say all edits like that should be better flagged to a viewer, if you want to compare the edit to the outcome, if you want to talk about better workflows to prevent in future.  Sure.  Why not.  but it’s pretty repugnant to call that edit morally reprehensible in light of events and not call that monster out? Nah the bbc, us, the uk, all of us will lose if we play by rules that monsters like trump pay no heed to. “Go low go high” is aspirationally sound. But the BBC Is not the net loser on balance here even if you don’t  like what they did  when the BBC is disbanded it don’t be beside of decisions like this.  It will be because people side with Trump, Dacre and the rest 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...