Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PSJ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So nice of them to fence off the front, making it

> extra difficult to walk along the market on

> Saturdays.


They have just replaced the old fence which has been there for .. whatever ? with a new one .. same size.


Dulwichfox

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no that new fence is a different shop so there are

> two obstructions now. During the week no problem

> but a nuisance when the market is on.


The market is the problem... Most markets operate onto the road.

They got the road closed off to traffic but continue trading onto the pavement.


DulwichFox

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess that's because the road is only clsoed for

> half of the market. I'd like to see the whole of

> north cross road closed with stalls all the way up

> to the actress on both sides.


That would cause serious traffic problems for Fellbrig and Ulverscroft roads,

Whilst Fellbrigg has cut throughs to Lordship Lane, Ulverscroft has no cut throughs.

Both roads are jammed on market days meaning imposible for cars to turn round.

Do you expect residents to reverse 350 mtres to get out.


DulwichFox

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I guess that's because the road is only clsoed for

> half of the market. I'd like to see the whole of

> north cross road closed with stalls all the way up

> to the actress on both sides.


Despite the popularity of the market, it seems to me rare for all the current stall-holders with allocated spaces to actually turn up on a Saturday. Though more will turn up in the run up to Christmas, often the number of stalls is very much depleted so I think attracting stall-holders for a larger market will be difficult.

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> no that new fence is a different shop so there are

> two obstructions now. During the week no problem

> but a nuisance when the market is on.



The new fence is outside the shop next to Sweet Sanctuary.


It has builders in at the moment.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Abe_froeman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I guess that's because the road is only clsoed

> for

> > half of the market. I'd like to see the whole

> of

> > north cross road closed with stalls all the way

> up

> > to the actress on both sides.

>

> Despite the popularity of the market, it seems to

> me rare for all the current stall-holders with

> allocated spaces to actually turn up on a

> Saturday. Though more will turn up in the run up

> to Christmas, often the number of stalls is very

> much depleted so I think attracting stall-holders

> for a larger market will be difficult.



I agree.


Sometimes there are very few stalls there at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...