Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just about out of ideas on how to get little snowboarder to drink any milk - and after seeing an ad for toddler formula with straws and watching him down some apple juice from a carton (never had before!) I wondered whether you can get little cartons of fresh cows milk with straws? Looked in sainsbury but couldn't see them?

Cool thanks - had not occurred to me to look in UHT bit of supermarket. Does it taste disgusting?


Could try the milkman - although I do not want someone clattering around outside at the critical 5-6am wake up time!!


Bought a carton of rice milk from Health Matters to try. I think you could say Not A Success. Although I tasted it and it was vile.


Started wondering why I actually want him to drink milk - do they actually need to? Man in healthmatters told me no, rubbish, they don't....so why do I think they do?!?

The UHT one tastes fine. I had a craving for milk when pg with the twins and drank a lot of it myself. I think while the vegan lobby will say that dairy isn't essential for humans (and I say that as a veggy myself!) and there is a lot of hype around milk, toddler milk etc etc... a reasonable amount of dairy produce for the average child fits quite well within a balanced diet though there are other sources of protein and calcium... hummous for eg.... cheese and yoghurt are good and milk in itself isn't an essential.

Thing is I LOVE drinking milk!! I have a probably totally flawed theory that b/f babies will never really be into drinking cows milk - this is based on the extensive research I have done - ie - I was bottle fed and LOVE milk - sister was breastfed and can't stand it. You see - very scientific.....


Anyway - interested in the milk man - poppy - do you know what time he comes?


Cheers all. He didn't like hot chocolate either. Weird, What's wrong with the child? Has milk on shreddies though and sucks the milk out of them, and eats yoghurt (on occasion), loves cheese and creamy sauces and eggs.

Snowboarder, don't worry - O was breastfed, but weaned at 16 months and really hated milk with a vengence until she was about 4. I just gave her loads of cheese, lasagne with home made white sauce full of milk, yoghurts etc. etc. Now at 6 she is a total milk fiend - has porridge every morning, and nicks C's milk whenever she can get away with it (swaps her for her juice!!).


C on the other hand is a milk fiend through and through, whether it's from the breast or bottle, cold, warm, cooked or whatever. She just loves it...now a month off 2 and don't see it changing.


What I'm trying to say is that I'd stop worrying so much about it. First time around I worried so much about food in general, how much, how often etc. with No.2 I've been much more relaxed, and not afraid to take a full plate of food away and then offer nothing until next meal time, and she's a far better eater. Could just be coincidence, but I really think they pick up on our stress, and sometimes just love to pull our strings.

Hi snowboarder, our milkman comes at about 4.30-5am I think. I hadn't thought of the risk of waking a little one until you mentioned it but my son's room is at the front of the house and he doesn't seem to be disturbed by it. When I've heard him he's not been very noisy - our milk comes in plastic bottles so no glass rattling going on.


On a separate note, I remembered today that a dietician friend once told me that she'd been getting children making Angel Delight to encourage them to drink more milk. Don't know how you'd feel about the sugar issue but if you can bear the mess, making it with your little boy might be one way of getting some milk into him...?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...