Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am about to go public on my reconstruction of the early mediaeval bounds of Friern Manor.


To save myself from potential embarrassment - has anyone already done this work?


Thanks.


John K


--------------



The present East Dulwich is Friern Manor with bits and pieces tagged on in modern times.


The map has the Friern Manor reconstructed bounds marked in violet. The bounds are not where some people will expect.


This draft map needs to be digitised as a GIS layer. The GIS software and the Ordnance Survey datasets are loaded. I've had a personal demonstration of how to use both, but it will be a steep learning curve.


I will be writing a short evidence based paper to explain where I have placed the bounds. Then I expect an "interesting discussion".


I will try to answer any questions that anyone wants to ask here.


John K

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13109-friern-manor-now-with-map/
Share on other sites

When was Friern Manor disbanded? Ie, given the later enclosures acts that succeeding landlords may have introduced it cannot have been an easy task to trace the original medieval boundaries. I know tithes were paid to the church by landlords, the size of which was related to their land-holding but I don't know how the dissolution of the monasteries affected this and the records of land held.

Ted Max:


I didn't know there was society in Peckham. I will try to be respectful as befits my lowly station in life.


silverfox:


So far I have not found any evidence to show that Friern Manor has ceased to exist. It is possible that Camberwell Vestry "bought out" the manorial rights early on in the 19th century. Something to investigate further.


The rest of your question needs a long convoluted answer, but you are on the right lines. I'm afraid you'll have to take a rain check.


John K

I don't mind if it is Ascension or Rogation as long as the squire, the vicar, the lawyer, and the doctor provide the free feast for the beaters.


If you're intending to reinstate this tradition you may wish to compile a list of 2010 equivalents who have inherited an historical obligation to dig deep into their pockets and pay for a free feast for the beaters.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...