Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am about to go public on my reconstruction of the early mediaeval bounds of Friern Manor.


To save myself from potential embarrassment - has anyone already done this work?


Thanks.


John K


--------------



The present East Dulwich is Friern Manor with bits and pieces tagged on in modern times.


The map has the Friern Manor reconstructed bounds marked in violet. The bounds are not where some people will expect.


This draft map needs to be digitised as a GIS layer. The GIS software and the Ordnance Survey datasets are loaded. I've had a personal demonstration of how to use both, but it will be a steep learning curve.


I will be writing a short evidence based paper to explain where I have placed the bounds. Then I expect an "interesting discussion".


I will try to answer any questions that anyone wants to ask here.


John K

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13109-friern-manor-now-with-map/
Share on other sites

When was Friern Manor disbanded? Ie, given the later enclosures acts that succeeding landlords may have introduced it cannot have been an easy task to trace the original medieval boundaries. I know tithes were paid to the church by landlords, the size of which was related to their land-holding but I don't know how the dissolution of the monasteries affected this and the records of land held.

Ted Max:


I didn't know there was society in Peckham. I will try to be respectful as befits my lowly station in life.


silverfox:


So far I have not found any evidence to show that Friern Manor has ceased to exist. It is possible that Camberwell Vestry "bought out" the manorial rights early on in the 19th century. Something to investigate further.


The rest of your question needs a long convoluted answer, but you are on the right lines. I'm afraid you'll have to take a rain check.


John K

I don't mind if it is Ascension or Rogation as long as the squire, the vicar, the lawyer, and the doctor provide the free feast for the beaters.


If you're intending to reinstate this tradition you may wish to compile a list of 2010 equivalents who have inherited an historical obligation to dig deep into their pockets and pay for a free feast for the beaters.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...