Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm with you Sean. The war and some hideous sixties and seventies developments were the end of London's traditional skyline.

No point going backwards, so developments like the London Bridge regeneration can surely only be a good thing, they're currently some of the ugliest buildings in London.

re: cost


Well, a large proportion of those buildings appear to be proper, City, type jobs so let Messrs Lynch, Morgan and co worry about the cost of those


If you mean the cost of the Olympic and related municipal stuff then clearly we are collectively going to be paying for it. But then again, I LIKE collectively paying for stuff. Gives us a sense of community and shared ownership. Oftentime anyway


I like the Dome. As a building. Not for anything they have done with it. Ever. but as a building. I wouldn't go back to a time before it existed. And most of it was paid via lottery money anyway. Which is NOT the same as taxation.

I shalln't risk incurring the wrath of the hardline administrator by straying from the skyline topic - but it's a skilled man indeed who can open so many cans of worms in so few words Sean.


Skyline branding is very interesting in the global cities chart. I have long argued that Glasgow retained its reputation for razor-weilding high rise blocks during the culture city 90's despite it's astonishing victoriana because the victorian stuff doesn't provide a notable skyline. Edinburgh's corporate logo of the same period was just the word Edinburgh with the skyline of the castle and st giles' cathedral above. For the same reasons I thought the London Olympic bid logo was fantastic - a thames shaped olympic riband.


Ultraconsultancy

monkeydoctor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thought this might be of interest: the central

> london skyline from our neck of the woods after 5

> yrs of planned building projects:


Fantastic - great views now and into the future. I now live half way down Forest Hill and the clincher when looking at the house was the view from the top floor back bedroom, also known as Dad's study!


Tonight I can see the Millenium Wheel, Houes of Parliament, St Pauls and so on. These new buildings add to London's charm - constantly changing, constantly challenging, constantly London. Unless central London planning has changed completely (and it may have) on the ground old rights of way and alley ways will still be preserved - so you can have the most modern glass and steel building athwart a Dickensian alley way with a Georgian pub or coffee house still part of the adjacent structures. cf "The Old Samuel Butler's Head" in the city.

  • 5 years later...

Nice geo work.


Your window ledge needs a scrub after 5 years.


If you ever have the pleasure of visiting Japan - spend a day in Tokyo and go up to the top of the Goverment Building (forget what its called) and take a photo - then compare to London. We have it good, at the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...