Jump to content

Recommended Posts

huncamunca Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> should take more care when dressing.Or get his

> Butler to check him over before leaving the house


Brilliant - have to agree with you there huncamunca, sooooo funny. It must have been the Butler's day 'orf....


PS. Couldn't resist responding, George Osbourne is one of my bugbears.......grr (6)

They think the savings will come from getting some of the unemployed into work but they haven't factored for the new unemployed that are goig to arrive when the public sector cuts hit. They also can't legally reduce the base rate of basic benefits....so JSA/ Income Support/ ESA....anyway so they only way they can cuts benefits is by taking people off more expensive benefits and putting them onto cheaper ones whilst taking away additional benefits from some like DLA and so on.


Every government talks tough on benefits and then the reality sets in. Fraud and the excessive bills for families with lot's of children apart, there's not a lot you can cut. The biggest section of the welfare bill goes to pensioners and state pensions (around 60% of the bill). The no. of pensioners is set to increase, so whilst additional benefits like winter fuel allowance/ TV licence/ travel passes can be means tested, any savings will soon be swallowed up by growing numbers of pension claimants.


It's a timebomb that can't be fixed without massive investment in job creation.


Nick Cleggs constituency in Sheffield sees the unemployed outnumber available jobs by 8-1.....you can't demonise the unemployed when there aren't the jobs for them to look for. Pity that Sheffield Forgemasters won't be getting the grant now that would have created those much needed 3000 secure jobs.


Oh and the outfit is very funny.........lol...........

my nearest big town from home is Middleborough, I knew we'd be fked when the election came through, statistically that was proved today. This government has 17 millionaires in the cabinet, do I feel that your average person and their needs will be adequately considered and fulfilled...... errr no. The wastelands of 3 generations of unemployment (created by thatcher) is about to be compounded by cuts in the only stable employer in the north east- the civil service - with the cuts in benefit (some of which may have been ration) you create a large chunk of the country without hope, who cannot produce and will ultimately become a cost.


as for GO, oh hes just a large throbbing sea oh sea kay. A blue suit, really, with yellow. I went to university with these people their grip on reality is a tight as a...

yeah but at least IKEA*** will give me the basics of what I vaguely want and providing I have my own spanners and a some spare 'bits", I can fk it up myself, this coalition is full on MFI. shit design, wonky in implementation and will need be to replaced in 5 years with something more substantial....


*** in fairness to ikea i once drank myself through a parental visit then was saved by ikea through meatballs and that never end fizzy drink facility, i even bought some sort of cupboard stacking device.


only this coalition could include something so clearly wrong as danny alexander.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The OP may be referring to GO appearing to be

> flying at half-mast (at the bottom of the page) -

> although it might just be the shiny lining of his

> jacket catching the light - it's not clear.


HAL - indeed they are (well that's what I thought) referring to ' the graphic at the end of the article', that's what's so funny.


Gosh, I didn't *read* it, I only looked at the pictures ;)

dita-on-tees Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didnt even notice it, though I would rarely look

> at the trouser region of a Tory. There's nothing

> there of interest for the likes of me


Interested enough to read the thread tho? and that's what the thread is about ...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
    • I don't have a beef with you. But I do have a beef with people who feel that a certain portion of the public's opinion isn't valid.  I don't like racism any more than anyone else here. But I do dislike the idea that an individual's thoughts, beliefs and feelings, no matter how much I may disagree with them, are somehow worth less than my own.  And I get the sense that that is what many disenfranchised voters are feeling - that they are being looked down upon as ignorant, racists who have no right to be in the conversation. And that's what brings out people on the margins and drives them towards extremes, like Reform.  Whether you like it or not, the racist, bigot, anti-european nextdoor to you has just as much say in the country as you do. Intellectual superiority is never going to bring them round. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...