Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think it's as simple as 'soft vs not Brexit', the general consensus on the Remain side is not to stop the Brexit process but rather that the country should be allowed a second vote on the terms of Brexit, be they hard or soft. As it stands people voted for a concept, without any idea what it entailed politically, economically and socially...

Some thoughts on populism:


1 In an era of mass apathy (not new but now greatly accentuated - all that was happening at least by the mid C19th after the great rural to urban migration) people will vote not in adulation (the fascist model) but in a mix of resignation, resentment (not voting for her!), and just hope-for-something-better even though we know he doesn't mean what he says (the politics of nostalgia, for having back something that has only the status of fantasy).


2 The causes of mass apathy are nothing to do with immigration, but immigration accentuates it for those who are already cut off from a sense of living-engagement with others. In the rich and growing city I love immigration. In an isolated or impoverished place it is hated. But it is fairly transparently the focal point for anger and resentment rather than the underlying condition (and is not generally meant when people find they do have a living relation to a migrant worker). Think of the many ethnic communities that have settled so well all over the UK and so enriched our inter-national culture in times of economic growth.


The consequences of 1 and 2 are going to be a disaster. Trump and Brexit have promised utopias - no such place. Immigration is the life-blood of our otherwise ageing population (think Japan). There will be more disruption, not less. The resulting step-change in disenchantment will risk reactionary politics - we are already seeing this in the UK from an irresponsible and cynical government.


3 The causes of mass apathy have little to do with the growth of the narcissistic personality (again, this is a focal point for a few but not the underlying issue). It is more sensible to see that personality as a requirement of the shift from industrial to service production. Individuals here need to be personalised: not so on the assembly line (where stoic discipline is required). Like any form of personality it has its pathological variants (the narcissism of entitlement, rights without responsibility, immediate gratification, resentment of anything difficult, outrage at non-conventional forms of thought, the disgraceful (and growing) campaigns to stop freedom of speech on university campuses) as well as its great virtues: respect for the other, welcoming of alterity, disbelief in atavistic notions of nation and religion, rejections of demands for conformist behaviour in regard to gender, sexuality and drugs.

"As for the future, commentators such as Haidt and Lilla seek a ?post-identity? liberalism, built round a restoration of the nation state as repository of agreed values"


I worry about the idea of "agreed values" (like some kind of multinational insurance company). As an immigrant, what I've liked about this country is its tolerance and pragmatism, people don't bang on about being British in the way Americans and Aussies do, for example, and that's nice. Maybe I'm living in a bubble.

There is a problem with the fetishisation of minorities in large parts of the (mainstream) media.


Reading Twitter and Huffington Post etc, it is hard to avoid the breathlessness with which writers gush over anyone who is not a male Caucasian. It's boring and ineffective and it drives home divisions, ultimately, because it pushes identity/individualism over community (despite what they think they are trying to achieve). The "strong, gay woman" or "fierce, disabled Muslim" or "glad-to-be-mad Cornishman" thing is tiresome, hackneyed and (self) indulgent.


I tick a few boxes but am fed up with hearing the cringe-making lionising praise of a certain "varietal" of human being every time I open a newspaper/social media.


As Maya Angelou wrote, we're more or less the same.

I think the emphasis in the Jenkins article is misplaced. I believe that people only really get worried about 'identity' when they're beleaguered.


I would say that the political shifts and upsets we're seeing at the moment are all about the economy, and more specifically the glaring (and growing) inequalities within it. There's a sense that governments are unable, or unwilling, to shield their citizens when times get tough. Everything else grows out of that - surely. And the roots of this are much more about the failure to respond adequately to the financial crash of 2007-8 than broader issues of globalisation.


I think that's the story in the UK, anyway. The US is probably a bit different. And there lies another problem - conflating the UKIP vote and the Trump vote - I don't think they're quite the same thing (however much Mr 'Lift Doors of Gold' Farage might like to believe they are).

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the emphasis in the Jenkins article is

> misplaced. I believe that people only really get

> worried about 'identity' when they're

> beleaguered.

>

> I would say that the political shifts and upsets

> we're seeing at the moment are all about the

> economy, and more specifically the glaring (and

> growing) inequalities within it. There's a sense

> that governments are unable, or unwilling, to

> shield their citizens when times get tough.

> Everything else grows out of that - surely. And

> the roots of this are much more about the failure

> to respond adequately to the financial crash of

> 2007-8 than broader issues of globalisation.

>

> I think that's the story in the UK, anyway. The US

> is probably a bit different. And there lies

> another problem - conflating the UKIP vote and the

> Trump vote - I don't think they're quite the same

> thing (however much Mr 'Lift Doors of Gold' Farage

> might like to believe they are).


and ironically we're sacrificing the economy (possibly)

in order to take back control - what control ?


Mark Carney has made some effort recently and been ignored

(or pushed back in his box).

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would say that the political shifts and upsets

> we're seeing at the moment are all about the

> economy, and more specifically the glaring (and

> growing) inequalities within it. There's a sense

> that governments are unable, or unwilling, to

> shield their citizens when times get tough.

> Everything else grows out of that - surely. And

> the roots of this are much more about the failure

> to respond adequately to the financial crash of

> 2007-8 than broader issues of globalisation.


Sort of - it's not identity politics itself that has been lowering living standards, but while "the Left" has been focusing on identity politics, a lot of traditional Left issues (workers' rights, jobs etc.) weren't being dealt with by the Left. Or that seems to be the popular feeling. The other aspect is that Labour bought wholesale into free markets, deregulation etc. preceding the GFC, and only with Corbyn in this country appear to return to some of those old points, so when isolationists like Trump come along and offer those old comforts there are people who are very receptive, whose views or needs weren't being addressed. In fact, Trump and Corbyn are, I think, different manifestations of the same underlying problems. An example of the kind of thing I'm thinking of are Trump adverts focusing on Clinton's hedge fund campaign funding.

  • 3 weeks later...

Thing is, attacks like this are becoming so common that we're all getting desensitised to them. That doesn't mean they're any less terrible, but what else is there to say?



Whereas Farage is so blatantly being outrageous, it's right that people respond to it. We can't allow this sort of shit to become the new acceptable, and I genuinely believe we're moving that way.

You haven't become desesntitised to Farage's comments yet? His home spun idiocy is pretty common. I have Deja Vu BTW Otta I'm sure I'm having this conversation on two places at once :)


Did you take the same stance on say all the comments when Thatcher died out of interest?


Much of left wing social media is a putrid place too

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thing is, attacks like this are becoming so common

> that we're all getting desensitised to them. That

> doesn't mean they're any less terrible, but what

> else is there to say?


And have been much more violent and frequent in Iraq for over a decade, but those barely make it into the bylines these days.

The two are different stories. It's just silly to suggest that Farage can say outrageous things and because there are other horrors going on, we shouldn't talk about it.

Your observation about the 'left wing media' isn't born out by the front pages BTW. Look at which papers led with what.

How about:


"?[i would like to] go back to the 1980s and assassinate Thatcher."


From the shadow Chancellor - a man who incidentally lionized and championed the IRA who nearly did assassinate her and her democratically elected cabinet - say......


...and there's tons of similar, mainly from the sanctimonious, hypocritical left who are just as unpleasant in many cases - a continued dialogue of "Tory Scum" is part of this you know......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...