Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just want to ask about people's views/ experiences


I have made a booking for a group of friends for a Christmas get together at a bar/ restaurant (not in ED). The venue have been very specific/ rigid about the menu- they have a 'party' menu that mainly consists of shared platters. In order to make the booking I had to lay down a deposit. They then asked me to order food and pay in advance. Fair enough, I know Christmas parties can be troublesome for restaurants.


What I was surprised about was when I realised they had totalled the bill incorrectly and contacted them. I was advised that the additional amount was the added service charge.


Is this a regular practice to add on the service charge before there has been any service? I would always tip generously anyway but AFTER the meal!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133515-service-charge-before-service/
Share on other sites

I guess they're thinking that if you pay for the food in advance then they've lost the opportunity to harvest the service that would 'normally' come at the end of the meal/party.

you could argue that service has not occurred yet, but the food hasn't been served yet either and you've paid for that.

My personal pet hate - christmas set menus and sharing platters. It is hard to avoid during December, but I pretty much boycott any resturant that does this. I'd book somewhere with a reduced menu, but no way I'd pay in advance. I realise that's nothing to do with your question! If I had your situation, I would pay the food, and tip on the day.

Yep, many good points made. I too hate the Christmas set menus and sharing platters but needs must.


I have paid the service charge and wouldn't dream of not doing so. Even if the service turns out to be terrible I wouldn't ask for it to be returned.


I'm too English and so I just moan about it!


Just thought it was a bit of strange practice to add a tip onto my bill without telling me and before we have been served

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm too English and so I just moan about it!

>

> That's why service is poor, in general and when

> compared to certain other countries. (Think it is

> much more of a class thing rather than a national

> identity thing, BTW, anyway.)


True, service might improve if everyone states their case rather than just grumbling.


Interesting to note that you have assumed a class for me though..... I wonder which class you have put me in?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 11 fixtures...   Saturday 8th November Tottenham Hotspur v Manchester United Everton v Fulham West Ham United v Burnley Sunderland v Arsenal Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers   Sunday 9th November Aston Villa v AFC Bournemouth Brentford v Newcastle United Crystal Palace v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v Leeds United Manchester City v Liverpool
    • Another recommendation for Dulwich Test and Services Centre. Only been using them for a couple of years but wish I’d found them earlier 
    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
    • It's not really though, is it. It's practical.  At least we're allowed Christmas lights.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...