Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm... basically the pro-EU PM lost a referendum

> on a reform package, and is therefore standing

> down. It's being seen as a proxy victory for their

> brand of Eurosceptic populism.


That doesn't sound very bravissimo to me. But i'm very much a europhile.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1079906
Share on other sites

Post-Mussolini, the Italian constitution makes it very difficult for such a dictatorial/authoritarian figure to rule Italy again. Which is understandable, however it's also meant that successive governments find it just as difficult to govern, it's why there has been so many elections/pacts etc over the years. The soon to be resigning Italian PM wanted a change to the constitution in order to give him and the governing party more power, in this case the means to deliver an austerity package. As is their way, voters took the opportunity to make a protest vote, but it wasn't a straight forward vote against the EU. Some would've voted No for constitutional reasons, some on the EU, and some on a general unhappiness with the sitting Gov and PM. Having a referendum mid-term wasn't the Italian PM's brightest idea.


An interesting aside of the Austrian vote...


Anton Mahdalik, a Freedom party member of the Vienna city council, criticised former Ukip leader Nigel Farage for contributing to the party?s defeat after claiming on Fox News that Hofer would hold a referendum on Austria leaving the EU. ?That didn?t help us, it hindered us,? he said, saying that an overwhelming majority of Austrians support EU membership.


Hofer himself described Farage?s comments as a ?crass misjudgment?, adding that ?it doesn?t fill me with joy when someone meddles from outside?.


Well done Nige!..:)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1079921
Share on other sites

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but it wasn't a straight forward vote

> against the EU.


That was my impression too - seems pretty indirect to me. Not that the papers presented it that way in the headlines. "Italians vote on constitutional reform, which may down the road influence their relationship with the EU in an unspecified way" isn't as catchy as "ALARM! ALARM! JUMP OVERBOARD IMMEDIATELY!".

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1079956
Share on other sites

The point is that the Vote was a defacto vote of confidence in the Italian PM rather than his constitutional reform, as he said he's resign if he lost; he did, he has - there may now be an election (but not necessarily), in which case the two big eurosceptic parties (the comedian's one and the Northern League) are ahead in the polls and potentially could offer a referendum on certainly The Euro, more (likely) and maybe the EU. However getting a majority in Italy is not easy...
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1079960
Share on other sites

PS I knew Italy was pretty sclerotic, but I read in the paper this weekend that since the advent of the Euro (1999) Italy's economy hasn't grown , France's has by 20%, Germany's 21% and the UK's by 33%. Thank god we never joined that particular 'project'*


If only El Pibe and Hugenot were still here I'd resurrect the old Euro thread from way back :)


*blows grateful kiss to Gordon and Ed B

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1079968
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The point is that the Vote was a defacto vote of

> confidence in the Italian PM rather than his

> constitutional reform, as he said he's resign if

> he lost; he did, he has - there may now be an

> election (but not necessarily), in which case the

> two big eurosceptic parties (the comedian's one

> and the Northern League) are ahead in the polls

> and potentially could offer a referendum on

> certainly The Euro, more (likely) and maybe the

> EU. However getting a majority in Italy is not

> easy...


Yep, pretty indirect.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1079994
Share on other sites

Nobody is claiming it's a simple anti-EU vote... but the opponents making the most noise were the Eurosceptic parties, so they're obviously seeing it as one small victory, and it would appear to give them a little bit of momentum.


Of course it doesn't actually mean that 60% support withdrawal from EU.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1080024
Share on other sites

the referendum was not for the now ex pm Renzi ......but for a change of the of the Government, less people working there and less money for them ....if you were voting YES. But most of people especially the young one voted NO because they thought was for Renzi..... Anyway Most of the Italian people are good to complain but they don t like to change !!!!

My point is that Mr Renzi was a copy cat of David Cameron just for having more "Show" .......Italian people need to change and fight for the change .......Poor country

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/133896-italia/#findComment-1081837
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...