Jump to content

Recommended Posts

we have been invited to a wedding in south africa (march 2011). we have a little one who will be 15 months by then. does anyone know what vaccinations/ medications we might be looking at for this?


I have recently refused the BCG for her now im wondering if i should have got it done ((arghhh decisions!?)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13470-any-south-african-mum-or-dads/
Share on other sites

We took our son to SA at 3 months and he didn't have to have anything (i'm 99% sure however still had baby brain then, actually still have it now!!!). Thinking about it he had had his 1st 2 jabs but not his 3rd and certainly hadn't had his BCG.


How fabulous, you'll love it :)

I never read anything about having to have the BCG for SA either, but if your little one is 15 months by then would think the MMR would be ideal. When we went to SA no one had any extra vaccines but then we were only in the Western Cape/Cape Town area but it really does depend where you go (ie, the lower areas are more prone to Malaria including Kruger Park). I would ask your GP to be sure. Have a lovely time.

We son went to SA when he was 6 months so only had the usual limited jabs.

He's since had the BCG - other then me originally being from SA hubby likes going 'into the bush' and roughing it whether in Africa or Asia so we got it just to be safe but also hopefully our son will travel when he's older too so at least he's covered.

With regards to mozzies - you should be fine but maybe use citronella oil for your little one - obviously not directly onto the skin but put a drop onto the clothes.

Water is SA is generally absolutely fine directly from taps too - if you end up in a game park or bush just ask - but your hosts will generally provide bottled water if there were any risks regardless.

If anything make sure you've got sun protection and good skin creams (we just notice that while their sin is healthy in the sunshine it can dry out quite a bit.)

Enjoy!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...