Jump to content

Recommended Posts

7.45am this morning queues both lanes, but noticed that while my westward travelling lane got two goes on the green light, the opposite lane didn't move when our lane was redlighted. with a tailback to Red Post Hill. SO presume not working. Coming back the other way, 45 minutes later, the same. Then a workman came out with a Stop/Go sign and nonchantly swizzled it around while smoking a fag.It would be quicker to have no lights and people use their common sense in giving way in a road narrowed for the length and width equivalent of one double parked car.
Agree. Both sides of traffic were stuck at stalemate for 10 minutes yesterday afternoon and I was at the front but cars overtook me as lost patience! I continued following them the short distance between the temporary traffic lights as had to keep up with traffic flow!

Yeah the lights are dodgy and the workman prefer to smoke and check their phones. Here's the contact info if anyone needs to log a complaint.

Cappagh: 020 8947 4000

Cappagh.co.uk


I'd like to add for the drivers riding south on East Dulwich Grove be mindful that the zebra crossing just before the temporary construction site traffic light is still in operation. I've seen 2 near misses as impatient drivers jump the cue only to realize that someone is trying to cross the street on the zebra.


The worker told me its a 10 day job.

I'm a pedestrian and stopped to tell the workman that the lights were not working - it gets dangerous because people then start overtaking and speeding through.....he nodded smiled and completely ignored me!....sorry I tried?! How hard can it be for them to tell those 'in charge'....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...