Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark Council Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Cate,

>

> Thanks for your questions.

>

> The visits we pay to homes are based on

> information recieved from any number of sources;

> direct to us, general chat to people, observation

> whilst out on the streets etc. We do not follow

> people home.

>

> SASBU is the Southwark Anti Social Behaviour Unit.

> Further information is available on the council

> website.

>

> We do not DNA dogs. If we suspect the breed is of

> the banned variety we will seek further

> identification and often involve the RSPCA and the

> Status Dogs Unit.

>

> Hope this helps,

>

> Susan Hunter

> Area manager

> Southwark community warden service



Thanks for your reply. What happens if you suspect a dog is half pit or another banned breed?

I think we met them yesterday - they were very barky but actually very sweet when theowner introduced them to us


cate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is an irresponsible female owner of three

> schnauzers in Dulwich Park. Her dogs are always

> off the lead, and not under control. They are

> always rushing up to other dogs and people,

> howling and barking. The other day she was

> sitting in the cafe area while her dogs were

> running around loose. They kept approaching other

> dogs entering the cafe area and barking at them.

> Her dogs come haring over to me and my dog and

> surround us while barking. Whenever I have said

> something to her, she just says Oh

> sorry........she seems to have no concept that

> three dogs are a pack and she needs to keep them

> under control. I only posted this to vent really.

> This kind of person also gives dog owners a bad

> name.

puzzled Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect stevet is a wind=up merchant. if he

> isn't then he represents the worst kind of

> anti-doggist on this board (of which there are

> quite a few) I suggest a fenced area where steve

> and his tight-sphinctered friends can shamble

> around muttering together.


Puzzled, no he really is as obnoxious as he appears.

So that gives him the right to crusade against all dogs does it?


I had an attempted rape when I was 14, so would it be normal or useful for me to campaign for all men to be castrated because of what the two guys tried to do to me? Of course not. Being a victim of a crime does not give him the right to be obnoxious and offensive to hundreds of innocent people and their dogs.

Puzzled wrote:- he represents the worst kind of anti-doggist on this board


I am not anti-doggist at all, I have no problem with family pets or their owners.


I am against the owners who feel it necessary to keep and brandish a dog aggressive enough to attack and pull down, maim or kill a man woman or child.


I fail to see how that point of view is obnoxious.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Puzzled wrote:- he represents the worst kind of

> anti-doggist on this board

>

> I am not anti-doggist at all, I have no problem

> with family pets or their owners.

>

> I am against the owners who feel it necessary to

> keep and brandish a dog aggressive enough to

> attack and pull down, maim or kill a man woman or

> child.

>

> I fail to see how that point of view is obnoxious.



SteveT you say you are against the above, but you want dogs in a fenced off area, so that surely means ALL dogs?

I don't see what the problem would be in having a fenced off area for dogs to run off the lead, and requiring them (yes, all dogs) to be on the lead in all other areas. Since the council took down the fences in Goose Green, it's nowhere near as pleasant for young kids. I just wish that dog owners would remember that their "friendly and boisterous" dog doesn't necessarily appear that way to a 15-month old learning to take her first steps when it's racing round her and chasing anything that moves while its owner stands 50m away having a fag. The dog in question came perilously close to getting a size 9 in the face...


Oh, and if that was you, please also remember that if you're in a park throwing a tennis ball for a boisterous dog, it might be a good idea to throw it away from a toddler and her parents and the lady with two smaller dogs on leads (especially when they're the only other people in the park), rather than directly towards them. Just a thought.

I must say that Goose Green is such a small area that it is probably common sense not to have dogs offlead- given the Rye is just down the road. On the Rye itself there is, of course, a large children only area. It is fenced off and is a great safe area for toddlers to learn to take their first steps in peace.
I don't agree with having only a fenced off area for dogs to use in parks but I do think that sin bins are a great idea in parks for aggressive dogs or dogs in training. In my old area there was a sin bin fenced all the way round with a lockable gate where owners with aggressive dogs/dogs in training could run their dogs off lead and feel totally safe that there would be no confrontation with another dog. Generally it would be used by one owner at a time, you could ask if you could bring your dog in if the dog wasn't aggressive with other dogs or you would wait or come back later, the concept worked really well. Of course in the main park well behaved/trained dogs were able to run off lead and the sin bin was very close to the main park entrance so you could walk your dog out of the park quickly and safely. If anyone knows any parks where there are sin bins please let me know, I did find one but the fence had too many holes in it and the gate not secure enough for mine not to escape!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...