Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Sue,

Currently the North Cross Road market officially operates on Fridays as well as Saturdays. So a number of people have been fined for parking in areas reserved for market stalls that are never placed of come on Fridays. Rosie and I have been nagging officers for a couple of years now to remove those parking restrictions and suggested they expand the market on Saturdays.

---------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I live off of N.C. Rd. so does affect me. But

> no

> > letter.

> > The Council are hardly likely to send letters

> out

> > to anyone who might object.

> >

>



Yes, Fox.


I'm sure you are really well known to the council as somebody who might object.


I'm sure for every consultation they spend hours researching who not to send letters to in case they might object.


Lord give me strength, for the second time this morning :))

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Sue,

> Currently the North Cross Road market officially

> operates on Fridays as well as Saturdays. So a

> number of people have been fined for parking in

> areas reserved for market stalls that are never

> placed of come on Fridays. Rosie and I have been

> nagging officers for a couple of years now to

> remove those parking restrictions and suggested

> they expand the market on Saturdays.



Thanks James.


Is it too late to get the wording of the survey amended to make this clearer?


I had to leave it to come back to later, though like JW above I answered that question as best I could while saying I didn't understand it!

  • 1 month later...

Well, having (as I thought) saved the survey to complete later, as there was an option to do, when I went back to complete it (before the closing date of 31 January) there was nowhere on the site that I could find to retrieve it.


So I contacted the council officer concerned, and he couldn't find it either. Nor could he find any completed surveys (before anybody gets worried, it - eventually - turned out that there were 95).


Long and tedious story short, after many many emails and phone calls between us, I eventually had to start the whole thing again and complete it via an emailed Word document. Which was tonight. Well after the closing date now, but I have been assured that it will be included.


A few things: First, if you completed a survey online, you might want to check that it was actually retrieved to be included in the analysis.


Second, apparently the website is run by some outside company - either the whole thing or just the part with the surveys on.


Third: Given that I was able to save a partially completed survey but not to retrieve it, there seems to be something wrong with the website which this outside company needs to address.


Fourth: Given the length of time it took to sort this out (after a fashion) might the council think it would be a good idea to train any of their people who are dealing with online surveys so that they know, for example, how to access the relevant data?


I'd be interested to know if anybody else has had any similar problems, as originally I was told there had been ten emailed responses.


ETA: Just to add that the council officer concerned was extremely helpful, just didn't seem to have the technological know-how required, which is hardly his fault.

  • 2 months later...

https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/north-cross-road-market-east-dulwich-set-almost-double-size/


Rather than self raising bollards should the council also consider making Nutfield and archdale no through roads on a permanent basis, especially if they are putting in turning circles at the end.

Yes, I do - they were installed at the end(s) of Rye Lane, there was a huge amount of publicity before they became operational, a few people tried to follow buses over the lowered bollards, the bollards rose up promptly, the cars were damaged, the South London Press seemed to take the side of the car drivers and the council sadly (I think) abandoned the bollards.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...