Jump to content

better to rent out our house privately or with an agent ????


Recommended Posts

We will hopefully be moving out of Dulwich and up to Derbyshire in the new year. We are wanting to rent out our house in W Dulwich and so I'm trying to gather as much information as possible about how best to go about renting the property out..


Has anyone had a good experience with letting through an agency or privately ??


Many thanks.

ljs, I'd advise renting it through an agent. The agent would assume the burden of the landlord's obligations, certificates for boilers etc, deal with contractual matters. They will charge you of course, but if you're in Derbyshire it will take a weight off your mind.
I'm afraid I'd advise completely the opposite - have used several letting agents over the years, all pretty much the same. They have certainly not offered us any confidence at all in the tenants found (who have mostly turned out to be very nice), but the references in advance were so vague as to be meaningless and whilst I can understand that you might consider the distance a problem. With a laptop and the internet you can sort out most tenants problems from afar. At least then you don't run the risk of being ripped off twice, once by the letting agent and then having no choice but to use their tame (usually OTT) tradesman for any problems that arise.

I used a letting agent in East Dulwich. They put in a tenant from hell, having not checked anything. Not only was the tenant from hell being chased by several utility companies and most of the councils in London... but the agents would ring me up when she complained (for example) about a light bulb blowing. Complete nightmare.


Same thing happened with a different agent, on a different property, in East Dulwich. The tenant used a fake name, was not what he said he was, and nothing had been checked. Turned out he was a bailiff magnet (again, offences from across London), and in the end was being chased by the Met Police for alleged GBH on a bus driver in Brixton, amongst other things. Needless to say, when I re-occupied the property I had a trail of bailiffs turning up at my door, plus the Lambeth police sitting in my kitchen. It took me considerable time and effort to expunge the black mark over my property. (And this bloke is still using this as his driver registration address unfortunately, as DVLA will only change vehicle registration on my say-so, not driver - only he can do that, and of course he won't, for obvious reasons.)


All the private lets I've done have been fine.

I'd be inclined to go private, we rent our place in NZ (luckily my parents take care of most of the issues we have with the place) but while renting we were never very impressed with the agencies we came across, and have found the same here in the UK. I'm sure there are some good ones out there but most we have encountered seem to charge the tenants and landlords large fees yet do very few inspections and seem to take ages to sort out maintenance issues (and I tend to sort out most minor stuff myself).


My suggestion would be if you decided to go private is sort out a local trusted handyman (I sure there's plenty of recommendations on here) who can sort out any issues that come up with your place and leave a set of keys with a friend, and most importantly make sure any tenants are properly reference checked.

We rented our gaff a few years ago through a letting agent, and, whilst to a large extent I think it was a bit of money for old rope. since with a little bit of preparation, you could do all of the checks yourself. However, none of my private ads met with ANY responses from prospective tenants, but I did get a few annoying calls from other agents offering to let it out for me. Doh!


However, some of the services the agents offer, you can undertake to do yourself - like property imventorying (Which is really boring, I have to add). Also, you would probably be quite successful in re-negotiating their percentage.


Whichever you decide - good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
    • The sad reality is that the failures of the Tories and Labour cannot solely be attributed to Brexit, as convenient as that may be
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...