Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spot on DJKQ. My work brings me into contact with

> the rich - almost every one of the ones I've known

> was in the right place at the right time.

> Shakespeare summed it up beautifully in Julius

> Caesar:

>

> "There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which

> taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted,

> all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows

> and in miseries."

>



Cock. I've met and worked for plenty of people who have made some serious money on their own back, including a couple in the top 20 Times list...and they all take risks and many have turned their backs on relatively prosperous conventional careers (wage slavery as they see it)or no=prospect dead end jobs. 99% of people just haven't got those balls.


Where i'd agree is that many people in well paid professional jobs in the city/law etc etc owe much of it to their priveliged middle class backgrounds and educations more than their hardwork (though many work hard too) and heir intelligence.


Traders are different though...their results are there, under scrutiny (unless they're french) on a daily basis, they're measured on proper results not how far up the arse of their boss they are.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But of course they didn't get around to doing it

> before they had children or mortgages either.



Nonetheless a sweeping and lazy generalisation, which seems to hold up those that have made the gamble as superior beings worthy of puting up on a pedestal, and something we should all aspire to.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Children and mortgages provide wonderful cover for

> that unfinished novel, curtailed rock-stardom,

> business mega-empire that never was etc etc



Not all of us wanted to do these things anyway, some of us are content with what we have, is that such an alien concept for people to grasp?

I agree.. it's not an alien concept at all.


I'm not getting at anyone who doesn't want to do these things, nor putting people on a pedestal who do do (do do?) them - I'm just getting at people who spend their lives bemoaning the fact that they coulda been a contender doing this or that if only a or b or c or d hadn't have happened and stopped them, when the plain truth was that they just didn't actually get round to doing anything - or in some cases, even trying.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm still living in my cottage by the river in

> Dorest, making my own bread, growing my own

> vegatables, slaughtering my own animals, which is

> something 99% of all people haven't got the balls

> to do.


Well that's case proven then. At least one tenth of Dulwich bang-on about wanting to do this, but can't because they have children and mortgages etc etc.

Oh I agree...Emerson, the money side is just an example for want of a better phrase 'living your dream etc' ...most people don't do it, unless sitting on a crowded train, working for w*nkers, living in a box that costs as much as a castle on the Isle of Skye for 4 weeks holiday a year and a bit of grub in Franklins once a week is your dream of course

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm still living in my cottage by the river in

> Dorest, making my own bread, growing my own

> vegatables, slaughtering my own animals, which is

> something 99% of all people haven't got the balls

> to do.


Hugh F-W on the EDF - great, hi there! Got a book planned for Christmas? :D


Anyway, you're right that not everyone aspires to those other things, I think its just that it had to be pointed out that not everyone who is at the top of their game and stinking rich etc got there because they were already, well, stinking rich.


I'm on Chapter 4 btw ...

I think *Bob* got my point and Emerson completley missed it...there's no pedestal or worship or inherent value in what I'm saying but people who've made a lot of money on their own backs have by and large done a bit more than 'got lucky', although luck plays a part too.


You can think their scum, you can think their tossers, you can think it's wrong or obscene...but they've got balls

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree.. it's not an alien concept at all.

>

> I'm not getting at anyone who doesn't want to do

> these things, nor putting people on a pedestal who

> do do (do do?) them - I'm just getting at people

> who spend their lives bemoaning the fact that they

> coulda been a contender doing this or that if only

> a or b or c or d hadn't have happened and stopped

> them, when the plain truth was that they just

> didn't actually get round to doing anything - or

> in some cases, even trying.



Fair enough, I see where you're coming from.

Really? Most project managers in the city that I worked with just got promoted out of harms' way. They were universally appalling and I never understood why Organisations insist on employing so many of them. I've worked on so many top heavy projects I've lost count, and I doubt that any of them were on less than 80k.


Weirdly, despite endless ramblings about Public sector inefficiency, my experience there has been better.


Did any of them have balls?

No, some got a cushy number thanks to a mate after time in the forces, some just moseyed their way there, but most of them just went to public school.


Thinking about it, what do you mean by 'a lot of money'?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAL9000 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Spot on DJKQ. My work brings me into contact

> with

> > the rich - almost every one of the ones I've

> known

> > was in the right place at the right time.

> > Shakespeare summed it up beautifully in Julius

> > Caesar:

> >

> > "There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which

> > taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

> Omitted,

> > all the voyage of their life is bound in

> shallows

> > and in miseries."

> >

>

>

> Cock. I've met and worked for plenty of people who

> have made some serious money on their own back,

> including a couple in the top 20 Times list...and

> they all take risks and many have turned their

> backs on relatively prosperous conventional

> careers (wage slavery as they see it)or

> no=prospect dead end jobs. 99% of people just

> haven't got those balls.

>

> Where i'd agree is that many people in well paid

> professional jobs in the city/law etc etc owe much

> of it to their priveliged middle class backgrounds

> and educations more than their hardwork (though

> many work hard too) and heir intelligence.

>

> Traders are different though...their results are

> there, under scrutiny (unless they're french) on a

> daily basis, they're measured on proper results

> not how far up the arse of their boss they are.



If you can't be arsed I've found it here ;-)

80k is a decent salary or a lot of money? I'll let you point me to the relevant post rather than trawl through 7 pages of ramblings...again...thank you very much.


A quick swizz shows ?58k to be in top 5% and ?118k to be in top 1%.

Are they merely decent salaries, are we talking that weird new yardstick 'more than the prime minister' or are you referring to obscene money....can you give me pointers on that too when you're done patronising me?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nah the story is simple because the concept of

> fairness is simple

>

> And timeless. Fairness isn?t a recent buzzword. It

> has defined the better aspects of our whole

> evolution as a species. To try and stifle a yawn

> or opt out of the debate is poor

>

> *Bob* - that chapter is unwritten. Occasional

> flirting is as far as it gets I think


Piffle. I'm with Harry Lime


You know what the fellow said ? in Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace ? and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.

When something seems too cute to be true, it probably is


Any country which can produce the likes of


Le Corbusier

HR Giger

John bleedin? Calvin


Not to mentione the bow-down beauty of


Ursula Andress and Irene Jacob


Is a bit more than clocks and chocolates


And not only that but APPARENTLY, lot?s of bankers want to go an live there


Not Italy




(it should be confessed that the list of notable people on wiki doesn?t throw up many jewels)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...